A gender‐based categorization for conflict resolution

Abstract

PurposeAs the workforce becomes increasingly diversified, it becomes increasingly important for managers to understand the conflict resolution attitudes brought to information systems (IS) by both men and women. This research was designed to investigate assumptions that may exist regarding the relationship between gender and conflict resolution. Specifically, the intent of this study was to compare the conflict resolution strategies of males and females majoring in IS in order to determine if gender‐based differences exist.Design/methodology/approachThe Thomas‐Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument was utilized to assess the conflict resolution styles of 163 traditional‐age (18‐22) students enrolled in undergraduate IS courses at a large Midwestern university. Both ANOVA and t‐test analyses were utilized to investigate the relationship between gender and conflict resolution style.FindingsResults of this study indicate that, when compared with their male counterparts, women are more likely to utilize a collaborative conflict resolution style and men are more likely to avoid conflict. As collaboration is generally considered more productive and avoidance more disruptive in the conflict resolution process, the study suggests that women may possess more effective conflict resolution attributes than their male counterparts.Originality/valueThe results of this paper lend support to the theory that an individual's gender may be related to the development of conflict resolution styles. These findings also support the premise that female students in IS are highly adapted with regard to their ability to work collaboratively (and thereby successfully) in situations where conflict is likely to occur.

Conflict Management among Malay Married Couples: An Analysis on Their Strategies & Tactics

“…This may be due to the fact that the wives gender role tendency to concern for others, role expectation and their tendency to take care of husbands. The data is in accordance with the findings of Brahman et al (2005) who claimed that men and women tend to endorse conflict handling strategies that complement gender role expectations in handling conflicts, women unlike men, favor accommodating strategies. Men prefer to be more collaborating and avoiding in their style of conflict handling which accords precisely with gender role expectations, as they are expected to remain cool and in control (Haferkamp, 1991).…”

The effect of gender on negotiation behaviour

“…According to Calhoun and Smith (1999), women are also more likely to rate themselves as friendly and trustworthy. Results of a study carried out by Brahnam et al (2005) indicate that women are more inclined to use a collaborative con ict resolution style and men tend to avoid con ict. Since cooperation is generally seen as more useful and avoidance more obstructing in the con ict resolution process, their study suggests that women may have more productive con ict resolution characteristics than men.…”

A Review of Conflict Management Techniques in Projects

“…Integration style of conflict resolution is positively correlated to participants' satisfaction. Brahnam et al, (2005) have studied the relationship between gender and conflict resolution techniques used by a study of one hundred sixty-three Information Systems undergraduate students at a Midwest university in USA. They found that women use mostly collaborative style of conflict resolution and men avoid the conflict in information systems projects.…”