2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A gender-based approach to developing a healthy lifestyle and healthy weight intervention for diverse Utah women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CFU is a partnership among the University of Utah, the Utah Department of Health and leaders of five ethnically diverse communities in the state of Utah (African refugee/immigrant, African-American, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Hispanic/Latino and Pacific Islander); CFU is dedicated to improving health equity and access with local healthcare partners. 19 The leaders of the five communities queried their members to identify individuals or family who had a critical illness or had been admitted to an ICU. Participants who met study inclusion criteria were provided with oral and written information about the study.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFU is a partnership among the University of Utah, the Utah Department of Health and leaders of five ethnically diverse communities in the state of Utah (African refugee/immigrant, African-American, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Hispanic/Latino and Pacific Islander); CFU is dedicated to improving health equity and access with local healthcare partners. 19 The leaders of the five communities queried their members to identify individuals or family who had a critical illness or had been admitted to an ICU. Participants who met study inclusion criteria were provided with oral and written information about the study.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed information about UWAG study methods and the costeffectiveness of the intervention have been previously published. [15][16][17] All study procedures were approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board and the Phoenix Area Indian Health Service Institutional Review Board. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all subjects/patients.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developers documented why a new intervention was needed through reference to the research literature [29], healthcare policy [10], their own expertise in research [30] or practice [31], previous research findings [32], consultation with community members [33], or a combination of these [34]. The rationale for this was to justify the development of a new intervention by identifying an unmet health need.…”
Section: Action 1: Identify a Need For An Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mummah et al [59]), or from a combination of all of these (e.g. Simonsen et al [33]). Programme theory generated during development was sometimes articulated in a logic model specific to the intervention (e.g.…”
Section: Action 7: Involve Stakeholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%