2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10851-011-0311-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Gauss-Newton Method for the Integration of Spatial Normal Fields in Shape Space

Abstract: We address the task of adjusting a surface to a vector field of desired surface normals in space. The described method is entirely geometric in the sense, that it does not depend on a particular parametrization of the surface in question. It amounts to solving a nonlinear least-squares problem in shape space. Previously, the corresponding minimization has been performed by gradient descent, which suffers from slow convergence and susceptibility to local minima. Newton-type methods, although significantly more … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more general approach to overcome the possible nonintegrability of the gradient field g = [p, q] is to first define a set I of integrable vector fields i.e., of vector fields of the form ∇z, and then compute the projection ∇z of g on I i.e., the vector field ∇z of I the closest to g, according to some norm. Afterwards, the (approximate) solution of Equation (20) is easily obtained using (5), (9) or (18), since ∇z is integrable.…”
Section: Frankot and Chellappa's Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A more general approach to overcome the possible nonintegrability of the gradient field g = [p, q] is to first define a set I of integrable vector fields i.e., of vector fields of the form ∇z, and then compute the projection ∇z of g on I i.e., the vector field ∇z of I the closest to g, according to some norm. Afterwards, the (approximate) solution of Equation (20) is easily obtained using (5), (9) or (18), since ∇z is integrable.…”
Section: Frankot and Chellappa's Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way to cope with a possible non-integrable normal field was seen as a property of primary importance in the first papers on normal integration. The most obvious way to solve the problem amounts to use different paths in the integrals of (5), (9) or (18), and to average the different values. Apart from this approach, which has given rise to several heuristics [12,26,59], we propose to separate the main existing normal integration methods into two classes, depending on whether they care about discontinuities or not.…”
Section: Most Representative Normal Integration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7(c). (2) Observe that there are degenerate cases in which the specular surface itself affords a homography, e.g., if it is locally planar or reflects into a single point (i.e., the light map is constant). We can, however, safely assume that the background occupies a significant amount of the image.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional approaches include line-integral based methods [12,13] and reconstructions based on the calculus of variations [14,15,16]. A range of other methods have also been proposed with mixed results [17,18,19,20,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%