2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Gauss–Newton approach to joint image registration and intensity correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, we investigated the dynamic image alignment based on a sparse representation in principal components of the intervolume correlation matrix [22] and variance of intensities of spatially corresponding voxels over time [32]. Fourth, we implemented a dynamic version of [33] in extended state space (morphology and bolus flux) with regularization based on the elastic potential of the deformations and the sparsity-promoting total variation transform on the intensity changes. Registration performance was visually evaluated (morphology, motion, artifacts, deformation field, time intensity curves).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, we investigated the dynamic image alignment based on a sparse representation in principal components of the intervolume correlation matrix [22] and variance of intensities of spatially corresponding voxels over time [32]. Fourth, we implemented a dynamic version of [33] in extended state space (morphology and bolus flux) with regularization based on the elastic potential of the deformations and the sparsity-promoting total variation transform on the intensity changes. Registration performance was visually evaluated (morphology, motion, artifacts, deformation field, time intensity curves).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dual presence of deformation and tracer flux is the core decision problem for the registration of contrast-enhanced perfusion sequences. Without additional information on cardiac anatomy or haemodynamic, this has been addressed, for example, by state space extension [33], sparseness assumptions [25], variations of PCA [20,21,23,24], or explicit spatiotemporal regularization in order to separate motion components from contrast enhancement. The assumption underlying ASTRA4D and [22] is that intensity changes can be captured by a low dimensional linear acquisition model.…”
Section: Motion Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method used a non-rigid joint motion and intensity correction algorithm, introduced in [36]. This algorithm integrates changes in intensity to compensate motion artifacts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%