2011
DOI: 10.1039/c0cp02392b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A gas-phase crossed-beam study of OH produced in the radical–radical reaction of O(3P) with iso-propyl radical (CH3)2CH

Abstract: The gas-phase radical-radical reaction dynamics of ground-state atomic oxygen [O((3)P)] with iso-propyl radicals, (CH(3))(2)CH, were investigated by applying a combination of high-resolution laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy in a crossed-beam configuration and ab initio calculations. The nascent distributions of OH (X(2)Π: υ'' = 0) from the major reaction channel O((3)P) + (CH(3))(2)CH → C(3)H(6) (propene) + OH showed substantial internal excitations with a bimodal feature of low- and high-N'' components… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After considering the barrier height and reaction exothermicity along the reaction coordinate, the title reaction is, in fact, predicted to be a major channel, which is consistent with the gas-phase kinetic experiments. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Statistical Analyses and Reaction Dynamics. The partitioning of the energy into the H products and the microscopic kinetic rate constants were derived using the aforementioned ab initio calculations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After considering the barrier height and reaction exothermicity along the reaction coordinate, the title reaction is, in fact, predicted to be a major channel, which is consistent with the gas-phase kinetic experiments. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Statistical Analyses and Reaction Dynamics. The partitioning of the energy into the H products and the microscopic kinetic rate constants were derived using the aforementioned ab initio calculations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crossed-beam apparatus used in this study was made in-house and has been described in detail elsewhere. 3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11] In brief, a pulsed O( 3 P) radical beam was produced by irradiating 2 atm of He (ultra-high-purity helium: 99.999%) seeded with 12% NO 2 (99.5%, MG Industries) with 30 mJ pulses from a 355 nm Nd:YAG laser beam (Continuum Surelite II-10) near the throat of the supersonic expansion. A second C 2 H 5 radical beam was prepared by supersonic flash pyrolysis of the precursor, azoethane (C 2 H 5 -N=N-C 2 H 5 ), synthesized using the method of Renaud and Leitch.…”
Section: Experimental and Ab Inito Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calculations: The density functional method and the complete basis set (CBS) model were employed to obtain the reaction mechanisms and pathways as well as the kinetic and dynamic characteristics of the lowest doublet potential-energy surfaces necessary to interpret the experimental data. [36] The geometries of local minima and transition states along the reaction coordinates were optimized at the hybrid density functional B3LYP level with 6-311G(d) and 6-311 + G(3df,2p) basis sets as initial guesses. [37][38][39][40][41] Vibrational frequencies of the geometries were computed to characterize stationary points and zero-point energy corrections with a scaling factor of 0.98.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Casavecchia et al disseminated the results of the crossed beam reactions of ground and excited state oxygen atoms with methyl (CH 3 ) 17,18 and allyl radicals (C 3 H 5 ) 19,20 at collision energies of 55.9 kJ mol À1 and 73.0 kJ mol À1 , respectively. Further, Choi et al conducted a series of experiments with the main emphasis focusing on the reactions of ground state atomic oxygen atoms (O( 3 P)) with hydrocarbon radicals allyl, t-butyl, ethyl, propyl, and propargyl, [21][22][23][24][25][26] Luntz et al revised selected systems. 27,28 The reactions investigated by Choi et al followed similar patterns, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%