2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-022-02410-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GAN-based Denoising Method for Chinese Stele and Rubbing Calligraphic Image

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we can make full use of the Wasserstein distance to make the estimated residual histograms as close as possible to the reference Gaussian noise histogram, so as to improve the residual estimation accuracy. As we know, the training of the GAN based denoising network [45]- [47] is to minimize the weighted sum of the content loss and adversarial loss. However, the proposed MRWM is a model based image denoising method which ably combines the multiple residual Wasserstein constraints and image prior regularization.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we can make full use of the Wasserstein distance to make the estimated residual histograms as close as possible to the reference Gaussian noise histogram, so as to improve the residual estimation accuracy. As we know, the training of the GAN based denoising network [45]- [47] is to minimize the weighted sum of the content loss and adversarial loss. However, the proposed MRWM is a model based image denoising method which ably combines the multiple residual Wasserstein constraints and image prior regularization.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) [1][2][3] and Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) -based methods [4][5][6] have achieved impressive performance for the IR task. Although these IR techniques can generate appropriate content for missing regions according to the remaining image patches, these methods still face significant challenges such as blurry artifacts in image restoration causing unpleasant visual effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%