2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A game theoretic approach for pricing, greening, and social welfare policies in a supply chain with government intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature on sustainability issues in the cooperative supply chain is also related to our paper. For example, Sinayi and Rasti-Barzoki [28] studied the effect of government intervention on the profits of the supply chain members, greening level of the product, and consumer surplus, and found that cooperation between members always results in greener products, more profit in the supply chain, and a higher consumer surplus. Hong and Guo [29] considered three different cooperation-level contracts, and pointed out that cooperation can improve the environmental performance but is not always profitable for all the members in the supply chain.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature on sustainability issues in the cooperative supply chain is also related to our paper. For example, Sinayi and Rasti-Barzoki [28] studied the effect of government intervention on the profits of the supply chain members, greening level of the product, and consumer surplus, and found that cooperation between members always results in greener products, more profit in the supply chain, and a higher consumer surplus. Hong and Guo [29] considered three different cooperation-level contracts, and pointed out that cooperation can improve the environmental performance but is not always profitable for all the members in the supply chain.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conrad (2005) took into account the influence of consumer environmental awareness and green product production costs in the process of green production decision-making, and made decisions based on maximizing social welfare [22]. Taking the three dimensions of sustainability (economy, environment, and social welfare) into account, Sinayi et al (2018) found that cooperation among members of the supply chain would produce products with higher greenness, which would benefit the whole supply chain and improve consumer welfare [23]. Taking a supply chain system composed of supplier, manufacturer, and the government as the research object, Guo et al (2016) investigated the effects of government green production subsidies on social welfare and the profit of supply chain members, and then obtained the optimal subsidy policy to maximize social welfare [24].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fraction d of remanufactured products converts into same quality to the new product and sold as new one (Gao et al 2016;Taleizadeh et al 2018). Similar to the works in Saha et al (2016), Alamdar et al (2018), Sinayi and Rasti-Barzoki (2018), and Taleizadeh et al (2019), the effect of logistics costs in forward and reverse supply chain between manufacturer to customers is also normalized to zero to improve the clarity of the analytical findings. The manufacturer sells the rest of the products in secondary market with a price of w s .…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the government provides subsidy q 0 þ qh, then the price paid by the consumer to the retailer will be p À ðq 0 þ qhÞ. The similar incentive policy is studied by the researches (Chu et al 2018;Sinayi and Rasti-Barzoki 2018) in the existing literature if q ¼ 0. However, green purchasing decision and amount of incentives depend on GL of the product (Mannberg et al 2014;Houde and Aldy 2014).…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation