2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06898-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Galerkin Radial Basis Function Method for Nonlocal Diffusion

Abstract: We introduce a meshfree Galerkin method for solving nonlocal diffusion problems. Radial basis functions are used to construct an approximation scheme that requires only scattered nodes with no triangulation. A quadrature scheme specific to radial basis functions is implemented to produce a Galerkin radial basis function method that yields fast assembly of a sparse stiffness matrix. We provide numerical evidence for convergence rates using one and two dimensional nonlocal problems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Redistribution subject to SIAM license or copyright; see http://www.siam.org/journals/ojsa.php Further, we comment that in the DG formulation, it is not essential to require that the discrete approximations are made of piecewise polynomials. In fact, more general discrete function spaces such as those represented by reproducing kernel spaces, radial basis functions, partition of unity, and other generalized/extended finite element basis [6,7,9,12,34,49] can also be used. We note that the key is to have the basis functions satisfying the volumetric constraints so that they conform with the modified energy spaces.…”
Section: Dg Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Redistribution subject to SIAM license or copyright; see http://www.siam.org/journals/ojsa.php Further, we comment that in the DG formulation, it is not essential to require that the discrete approximations are made of piecewise polynomials. In fact, more general discrete function spaces such as those represented by reproducing kernel spaces, radial basis functions, partition of unity, and other generalized/extended finite element basis [6,7,9,12,34,49] can also be used. We note that the key is to have the basis functions satisfying the volumetric constraints so that they conform with the modified energy spaces.…”
Section: Dg Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this work is to develop a unified meshless pseudospectral method to solve both classical (α = 2) and fractional (α < 2) PDEs. Its unique feature -compatibility with the classical Laplacian -makes our method distinguish from other numerical methods (e.g., in [13,14,3,2,7,1,6,7]) for the fractional Laplacian. Moreover, our method takes great advantage of the Laplacian (−∆) α 2 (for both α = 2 and α < 2) of generalized inverse multiquadric functions so as to bypass numerical approximations to the hypersingular integral of fractional Laplacian in (1.4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essence of the projection-based ROM is to project the full-order governing partial differential equations (PDE), e.g., 3-D Navier-Stokes (NS) equations, onto a reduced subspace spanned by a group of basis functions, which can either be data-based basis such as proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) modes [38] or dictionary-based basis including polynomials [39], wavelets [40], and radial basis functions [41]. It is expected that the reduced system after projection can be solved more efficiently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%