1983
DOI: 10.1002/mana.19831110104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Galerkin Method with Finite Elements for Degenerate One Dimensional Pseudodifferential Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We want to mention that the Galerkin method can converge for degenerate and, in particular, for not strongly elliptic operators if the subprincipal symbol a_1 (x, ) = a2j (x, ) -(2i) a2a2 /9x 0 satisfies additional requirements. The convergence of Galerkin's method with splines for such operators was considered by ELSCHNER [5] and' as a special case of the obtained results one can formulate:…”
Section: Convergence Of the Standard Galerkin Methods Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We want to mention that the Galerkin method can converge for degenerate and, in particular, for not strongly elliptic operators if the subprincipal symbol a_1 (x, ) = a2j (x, ) -(2i) a2a2 /9x 0 satisfies additional requirements. The convergence of Galerkin's method with splines for such operators was considered by ELSCHNER [5] and' as a special case of the obtained results one can formulate:…”
Section: Convergence Of the Standard Galerkin Methods Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the set of the right-hand sides, for which Galerkin's method converges, and the order of convergence is smaller than in the strongly elliptic case and this cannot be improved in general (cf. [5]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(0.1) one uses spline approximations for the unknown function x on F. The two most popular discretization schemes are the Galerkin and collocation methods. If F is a closed curve and c and d are continuous functions, then convergence and error estimates for Galerkin and collocation methods using smooth polynomial splines follow from recent studies by Arnold, Saranen, Stephan and Wendland in [4,23,27], by Nedelec in [14] and by Elschner, Schmidt and the authors in [8,16,17,19,21,22,24,25,26] (see also the surveys just given by Elschner, Pr6gdorf [18] and by Wendland [29]). Convergence results on the spline collocation method in the space L 2 for Eq.…”
Section: C(t) X(t)+d(t)rcz" ! Z-t Rmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The assertions (i) for s = (1 -1)/2 and (ii) for r 2 (2 -1)/2 are direct consequences of Theorem 6.4.1 and Corollary 6.4.4 in [7] (cf. also [5] in the case of more general finite element spaces). Combining this with the method of proof of Theorem 2.1 in [lS], one easily obtains Theorem 2.1 in the remaining cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…also [5] in the case of more general finite element spaces). Combining this with the method of proof of Theorem 2.1 in [lS], one easily obtains Theorem 2.1 in the remaining cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%