18th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2004. AINA 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/aina.2004.1283882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GA-based multi-purpose optimization algorithm for QoSrouting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many GA-based routing protocols with multiple QoS constraints have been proposed in the past decade, e.g., [28], [29], [30]. However, we argue that our approaches have made the following key contributions in the IoT settings: a) existing approaches only examined single flow performance, while multiple flows with different QoS requirements coexist in an IoT environment.…”
Section: B Genetic Algorithm-based Multi Constraints Flow Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many GA-based routing protocols with multiple QoS constraints have been proposed in the past decade, e.g., [28], [29], [30]. However, we argue that our approaches have made the following key contributions in the IoT settings: a) existing approaches only examined single flow performance, while multiple flows with different QoS requirements coexist in an IoT environment.…”
Section: B Genetic Algorithm-based Multi Constraints Flow Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the metric E is similar to the metric T defined in [18]. Figure 1 shows an ad hoc network sample.…”
Section: Problem Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They seek the optimal tradeoff (or Pareto-optimal) solutions and have no weight parameters to manually configure in their fitness functions [15][16][17][18]. Unlike existing MOGAs, EVOLT is designed to handle high-dimensional parameter and objective spaces well, minimize the number of manually-configured constants in genetic operators and visualize non-dominated individuals in a low-dimensional (two dimensional) SOM space.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High dimensionality in the objective space often leads to premature convergence, which fails to improve the optimization quality (or optimality) of QoS parameter sets. Traditional QoS optimization algorithms tend to deal with a limited number of parameters and optimization objectives; for example, less than 20 QoS parameters and three or less optimization objectives 1 [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%