2008
DOI: 10.1109/tfuzz.2007.903328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fuzzy Probabilistic Approach for Determining Safety Integrity Level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in the absence of accurate data, it may be necessary to work with rough estimates of probabilities, and the failure probabilities are treated as random variables with known probability distributions. Fault Tree Analysis FTA [23], [24] might be the only way to predict the reliability of a manufacturing milk unit when little quantitative information is available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the absence of accurate data, it may be necessary to work with rough estimates of probabilities, and the failure probabilities are treated as random variables with known probability distributions. Fault Tree Analysis FTA [23], [24] might be the only way to predict the reliability of a manufacturing milk unit when little quantitative information is available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare the resulting fuzzy probability of the safety instrumented system according to the method proposed in [11] and the result obtained from our approach, we encode the fuzzy probabilities in the evidential network given in figure 11 which is equivalent to the fault tree previously given. As it can be seen, the evidential network is based on the minimal cut set obtained from the fault tree in figure 10.…”
Section: Safety Instrumented Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it can be seen, the evidential network is based on the minimal cut set obtained from the fault tree in figure 10. Figure 12 gives the resulting fuzzy probability obtained from the fuzzy fault tree approach [11] in a large dotted line and the fuzzy probability obtained from the evidential network in a dotted line. Due to rare event approximation the fault tree approach doesn't give the exact most likely value (KernP(SIS)) whereas the fuzzy probability obtained from the evidential network gives the exact value.…”
Section: Safety Instrumented Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are simply recalled hereafter: (4) Now, the question is where to find quality reliability data, namely: λ D , DC, β, β D and MTTR. It is worth noticing that these parameters may be subject to uncertainty, especially since SIS are highly reliable systems and produce weak historical failure data [4], [5]. Furthermore, the recourse to generic reliability data may introduce uncertainty due to lack of relevance with respect to the system under study [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%