2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ascom.2021.100471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach for Exo-Planetary Habitability

Abstract: Nowadays, we know thousands of exoplanets, some of them potentially habitable. Next technological facilities (JWST, for example) have exoplanet atmosphere analysis capabilities, but they also have limits in terms of how many targets can be studied.Therefore, there is a need to rank and prioritize these exoplanets with the aim of searching for biomarkers. Some criteria involved, such as the habitability potential of a dry-rock planet versus a water-rich planet, or a potentially-locked planet versus a tidally-lo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Benaroya [47] used the AHP to define optimal lunar habitat construction. In addition, Sánchez-Lozano, Moya and Rodríguez-Mozos [48] ranked and prioritized the exoplanets intending to seek biomarkers using MCDM methods. In another study, Eren and Katanalp [49]…”
Section: Mcdm (Multiple-criteria Decision-making)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benaroya [47] used the AHP to define optimal lunar habitat construction. In addition, Sánchez-Lozano, Moya and Rodríguez-Mozos [48] ranked and prioritized the exoplanets intending to seek biomarkers using MCDM methods. In another study, Eren and Katanalp [49]…”
Section: Mcdm (Multiple-criteria Decision-making)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the integration of MCDM methodologies with fuzzy logic is not novel in the fields of astronomy and astrophysics, as evidenced by various studies [9][10][11][12][13], its application to the realm of SETI is unprecedented. This approach enables the prioritization of existing TSs based on the nine Axes of Merit, as proposed by Wright [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decision-making is used in selecting groups to make rankings which will then become several criteria that need to be evaluated [8], [9], [10]. Doing calculations for qualitative to quantitative data becomes the result of calculations in decision-making [11], [12], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%