Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy logic approach to supplier evaluation for development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending of the evaluation results, development programs for one or more suppliers may be necessary, or even to substitute one supplier by other one who have better performance (Sarkar & Mohapatra, 2006). Supplier development is especially important to critical items, those which have a high added-value or that have low supplier availability at the market (Osiro et al, 2014). The necessity of replacement or development of one supplier can be identified by a based evaluation in quantitative and multiple criteria techniques.…”
Section: Supplier Evaluation and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Depending of the evaluation results, development programs for one or more suppliers may be necessary, or even to substitute one supplier by other one who have better performance (Sarkar & Mohapatra, 2006). Supplier development is especially important to critical items, those which have a high added-value or that have low supplier availability at the market (Osiro et al, 2014). The necessity of replacement or development of one supplier can be identified by a based evaluation in quantitative and multiple criteria techniques.…”
Section: Supplier Evaluation and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each quadrant has a supplier classification and it addresses actions to be taken. This kind of method application examples are presented in Sarkar & Mohapatra (2006), Ho et al (2012), Rezaei & Ortt (2013) and Osiro et al (2014). Another applied approach consists in a general supplier ranking ordered by all performance criteria.…”
Section: Criteria and Techniques For Suppliers Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the extant literature, Li et al (1997), Holt (1998) and Osiro et al (2014) discussed the application of FST in SS. Sarkar and Mohapatra (2006) introduced a fuzzy set approach to measure performance (short-term criteria) and capability (long-term criteria) considering that many suppliers' evaluation criteria cannot be measured precisely.…”
Section: Ahp-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, its effectiveness is reduced in solving problems with vague and imprecise information [15] in which FAHP is more adapted [16], [17]. There are various FAHP methods, the first was proposed in 1983 by Van Laarhoven and Pedrycz [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%