A fuzzy linguistic quality evaluation model for digital libraries

Gijón, Javier López; Ruiz, A. A.

doi:10.1109/iske.2010.5680768

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, as mentioned in Section 1, since DLs are destined to serve user communities, the user’s opinion is one of the main aspects to be considered in the quality evaluation of DLs. For these reasons, techniques that require the user’s participation such as interviews and questionnaires are the focus of this review, and the prime methods for collecting qualitative data [8, 18, 25, 31–33, 35, 36, 38–47, 49–53]. In addition, observations in which user actions are recorded are also common methods for obtaining data [23, 24, 28, 63].…”

Section: Criteria Measurement and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A review of quality evaluation of digital libraries based on users’ perceptions

Heradio¹,

Fernández-Amorós²,

Cabrerizo³

2012

Journal of Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the past two decades, the use of digital libraries (DLs) has grown significantly. Accordingly, questions about the utility, usability and cost of DLs have started to arise, and greater attention is being paid to the quality evaluation of this type of information system. Since DLs are destined to serve user communities, one of the main aspects to be considered in DL evaluation is the user’s opinion. The literature on this topic has produced a set of varied criteria to judge DLs from the user’s perspective, measuring instruments to elicit users’ opinions, and approaches to analyse the elicited data to conclude an evaluation. This paper provides a literature review of the quality evaluation of DLs based on users’ perceptions. Its main contribution is to bring together previously disparate streams of work to help shed light on this thriving area. In addition, the various studies are discussed, and some challenges to be faced in the future are proposed.

show abstract

Section: Criteria Measurement and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In [47, 49, 51–53], to represent the user’s perceptions of the quality of the DL, fuzzy linguistic information [66, 67, 71–74] is used instead of numerical values. In particular, ordinal fuzzy linguistic modelling [66, 67] is used to represent the user’s perceptions.…”

Section: Criteria Measurement and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of quality evaluation of digital libraries based on users’ perceptions

Heradio¹,

Fernández-Amorós²,

Cabrerizo³

2012

Journal of Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the previous research, Herrera-Viedma, E. et al provided several evaluation methods for the information quality of specific Web sites, where fuzzy linguistic model and semantic Web technologies are jointly used to improve the evaluation process [16,15,17,14], which gives some helpful inspiration to the features extraction, especially semantic features extraction in statistical learning based methods.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Statistical cross-language Web content quality assessment

Geng

Wang

et al. 2012

Knowledge-Based Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A fuzzy linguistic quality evaluation model for digital libraries

Cited by 2 publications

References 46 publications

A review of quality evaluation of digital libraries based on users’ perceptions

A review of quality evaluation of digital libraries based on users’ perceptions

Statistical cross-language Web content quality assessment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About