2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy expert system for automatic seismic signal classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding feature selection, we have addressed the problem in this paper from the machine learning theory point of view, and most of the main features found by the algorithms were consistent with common features used in other works for event classification in other volcanoes [24], [28], [30]. Although the volcanologist significance of the most important features related to Cotopaxi volcano is still unclear at this moment, and it requires deeper and further investigation, feature selection techniques were used in this paper to simplify the problem of classification.…”
Section: B Results Using Linear and Nonlinear Svm Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding feature selection, we have addressed the problem in this paper from the machine learning theory point of view, and most of the main features found by the algorithms were consistent with common features used in other works for event classification in other volcanoes [24], [28], [30]. Although the volcanologist significance of the most important features related to Cotopaxi volcano is still unclear at this moment, and it requires deeper and further investigation, feature selection techniques were used in this paper to simplify the problem of classification.…”
Section: B Results Using Linear and Nonlinear Svm Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Similarly, in [23], a hidden Markov model (HMM) classifier was applied to the data from the San Cristóbal Volcano (Nicaragua), to identify LP from two types of explosions, and BN in raw seismic data, yielding an 80% accuracy rating. Another system was proposed in [24], in which a fuzzy algorithm was used for automatic classification of local and regional earthquakes, and two nonvolcanic originated events, i.e., QB and machinery noise. Six main features were considered in the time and frequency domains, yielding a 96% classification accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laasri et al [25] used a fuzzy rule-based expert system for seismic signal classification. Their purpose was to develop a rule-based expert classification system that can work in cooperation with the analysis information of seismic case classification and imitate human evaluation and deduction processes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rule-based reasoning is mainly based on the characteristics of the video content, and combine with professional theory to develop the relevant rules, according to which to derive the semantic feature extraction video [9,6] . Currently, these methods focus on applying the fuzzy theory into the developing of the rules [5] . Through all above research [4] for video semantic feature extraction, this paper proposes a video semantic feature extraction framework, aiming the actual needs and the target of video semantic retrieval.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%