2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy data envelopment analysis framework for dealing with uncertainty impacts of input–output life cycle assessment models on eco-efficiency assessment

Abstract: The uncertainty in the results of input-output-based life cycle assessment models makes the sustainability performance assessment and ranking a challenging task. Therefore, introducing a new approach, fuzzy data envelopment analysis, is critical; since such a method could make it possible to integrate the uncertainty in the results of the life cycle assessment models into the decision-making for sustainability benchmarking and ranking. In this paper, a fuzzy data envelopment analysis model was coupled with an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A limited number of researchers have focused on the MCDM and integrated expert weighting for sustainable product selection based on LCSA results [60,138,139]. In the literature, applications of MCDM methods combined with LCA results are abundant; however, few studies applied MCDM methods for dealing with multiple criteria, expert judgments, and uncertainties in LCSA [58,140]. To give some examples, Onat et al [23] used a combined application of multi-criteria optimization and an IO-based hybrid LCSA.…”
Section: Deepening the Assessment: Revealing Dynamic Causal And Tramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limited number of researchers have focused on the MCDM and integrated expert weighting for sustainable product selection based on LCSA results [60,138,139]. In the literature, applications of MCDM methods combined with LCA results are abundant; however, few studies applied MCDM methods for dealing with multiple criteria, expert judgments, and uncertainties in LCSA [58,140]. To give some examples, Onat et al [23] used a combined application of multi-criteria optimization and an IO-based hybrid LCSA.…”
Section: Deepening the Assessment: Revealing Dynamic Causal And Tramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing literature on the theoretical foundation of computational structure to undertake uncertainty analysis in LCA is slender [16]. Nonetheless, different techniques exist to analyse uncertainty such as: possibility theory, e.g., [17], fuzzy theory, e.g., [18][19][20], Taylor series expansions, e.g., [21], data quality indicators, e.g., [22,23], expert judgement, e.g., [24][25][26] and practitioners' belief, e.g., [27] or a combination of two or more techniques, e.g., [28,29]. Despite the breadth of available approaches, uncertainty analysis in built environment LCAs still remains largely untouched.…”
Section: Introduction and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing literature on the theoretical foundations of the mathematical computational structure for performing uncertainty analysis in LCA is still hardly practiced [ 32 ]. However, there are various techniques for uncertainty analysis, such as: the theory of possibilities, e.g., [ 33 ], fuzzy theory, e.g., [ 34 , 35 ], data quality indicators, e.g., [ 9 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ] and expert opinions, e.g., [ 36 , 37 ] or a combination of two or more techniques, e.g., [ 20 , 30 , 31 , 38 ]. Despite the wide range of approaches available, the analysis of uncertainty in LCA in the scientific and business process of bottle production remains largely unexplored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%