2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2016.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy approach for R&D compound option valuation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining the stochastic and fuzzy methods, Biancardi and Villani (2017) valued the R&D compound option. Tolga (2017) used Type-2 fuzzy logic to real option valuation.…”
Section: Pricing Derivatives In a Fuzzy Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining the stochastic and fuzzy methods, Biancardi and Villani (2017) valued the R&D compound option. Tolga (2017) used Type-2 fuzzy logic to real option valuation.…”
Section: Pricing Derivatives In a Fuzzy Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heng, Chen, and Tan (2014) stated that modeling compound options by Geske (1979) and the theory by Agliardi and Agliardi (2013), which generalizes Geske's theorem in time-dependent volatility and interest rate, could be applied in land expropriation practice in a fuzzy environment. Meanwhile, Biancardi and Villani (2017) modeled the compound American Exchange options with a fuzzy approach in their study. They declared that this option approach, which is suitable for sequential structure of R&D projects, could be used in a fuzzy environment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hassanzadeh et al (2012) adopted fuzzy pay-off method for R&D project evaluation and developed a fuzzy R&D project portfolio model. Biancardi and Villani (2017) presented a fuzzy approach to value R&D investments. Hesarsorkh et al (2021) formulated a robust possibilistic optimization approach for pharmaceutical R&D project portfolio selection and scheduling under uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%