The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.01.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy approach for bi-level integer non-linear programming problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the past few decades, the mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) method has been widely used for solving the above problems (Baetz 1990;Huang et al 1997;Glen 2003;Emam 2006;Chen 2007). Since conventional MILP methods cannot reasonably address the complex uncertainties, a number of interval-parameter MILP (IMILP) methods have been developed and applied in MSW management and planning (Chi and Huang 1998;Huang et al 1997Huang et al , 1993a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past few decades, the mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) method has been widely used for solving the above problems (Baetz 1990;Huang et al 1997;Glen 2003;Emam 2006;Chen 2007). Since conventional MILP methods cannot reasonably address the complex uncertainties, a number of interval-parameter MILP (IMILP) methods have been developed and applied in MSW management and planning (Chi and Huang 1998;Huang et al 1997Huang et al , 1993a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed a mixed-discrete fuzzy nonlinear programming approach that combines the fuzzy -formulation with a hybrid genetic algorithm using mathematical techniques for finding the minimum cost design of a welded beam. Eman (2006) [20] investigated a fuzzy approach for a bi-level integer nonlinear programming problem (BLI-NLP), which consists of the higher-level decision-maker (HLDM) and the lower-level decision-maker (LLDM). The paper was focused on two planner integer models and a solution method for solving the problem using the concept of tolerance membership function and a set of Pareto optimal solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let ∈ , ( = 1, 2, 3),be a vector of variables which indicates the first decision level's choice, thesecond decision level's choice and the third decision level's choice andF i : 2,3),be the first level objective function, the second level objective function and the third level objective function, respectively. Assume thatthe first level decision maker is (FLDM),the secondlevel decision maker is(SLDM) and the third level decision maker is(TLDM).…”
Section: Problem Formulation and Solution Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%