1964
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1964.tb00637.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Further Study of Some Cognitive and Other Disabilities in Backward Readers of Average Non‐verbal Reasoning Scores

Abstract: Summary. The application of the Watts‐Vernon Reading Test and a Non‐Verbal Reasoning Test to the whole of the fourth year pupils in fourteen secondary modern schools gave 426 pupils with a reading quotient <80; of these 204 had standardised non‐verbal reasoning scores ≥90. Thirty backward boys and twenty‐five backward girls, all of whom had non‐verbal reasoning scores ≥90, were paired, individually, with average to good readers, matched for non‐verbal score, social class, sex and school. The groups undertook … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some investigators report positive findings, there is no test that reliably differentiates between the Volume 12, 'Number 10, December 1979 performances of normal and reading-impaired children (see the conflicting findings regarding the Bender-Gestalt Test in Fabian 1945, Nielson & Ringe 1969, Symmes & Rapaport 1972, Lovell, Gray, & Oliver 1964, McManis, Figley, Richert, & Fabre 1978. Divergent findings may be due to differences in sampling the population of reading-disabled children across studies, an issue to be dealt with later in this paper.…”
Section: Standardized Psychometric Testsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Although some investigators report positive findings, there is no test that reliably differentiates between the Volume 12, 'Number 10, December 1979 performances of normal and reading-impaired children (see the conflicting findings regarding the Bender-Gestalt Test in Fabian 1945, Nielson & Ringe 1969, Symmes & Rapaport 1972, Lovell, Gray, & Oliver 1964, McManis, Figley, Richert, & Fabre 1978. Divergent findings may be due to differences in sampling the population of reading-disabled children across studies, an issue to be dealt with later in this paper.…”
Section: Standardized Psychometric Testsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For example, children in this age range who are better at suppressing associated movements (e.g., symmetrical or mirror-image movements of the hands) also do better academically (Blondis, Snow, & Accardo, 1990;Wolff, Gunnoe, & Cohen, 1985). Furthermore, such inhibitory control also correlates with superior performance in disembedding figures (Todor & Lazarus, 1986), a task that is analogous to disentangling lines on the JLOT (Mehta & Newcombe, 1991), is poorly performed by individuals with reading impairment (Elkind, Larson, & van Doorninck, 1965;Lovell, Gray, & Oliver, 1964), and involves independent contributions from both cerebral hemispheres for best results (Russo & Vignolo, 1967;E. Zaidel, 1973).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%