2009
DOI: 10.1038/ncb1876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A functional screen implicates microRNA-138-dependent regulation of the depalmitoylation enzyme APT1 in dendritic spine morphogenesis

Abstract: Summary The microRNA pathway has been implicated in the regulation of synaptic protein synthesis and ultimately dendritic spine morphogenesis, a phenomenon associated with long-lasting forms of memory. However, the particular microRNAs (miRNAs) involved are largely unknown. We performed a functional screen to identify specific miRNAs that function at synapses to control dendritic spine structure. One of the identified miRNAs, miR-138, is highly enriched in the brain, localized within dendrites and negatively r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
398
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 437 publications
(424 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
23
398
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We analysed two dendritically regulated UTRs; LIMK1 , which is regulated by miR‐134 (Schratt et al , 2006), and APT1 , which is regulated by miR‐138 (Siegel et al , 2009). Both of these miRNAs have been shown previously to regulate dendritic spine morphology (Schratt et al , 2006; Siegel et al , 2009), and we previously demonstrated that NMDAR activation increased translational repression of the LIMK1 reporter via miR‐134 and of the APT1 reporter via miR‐138 within 10 min after stimulation (Antoniou et al , 2014; Rajgor et al , 2017). Knockdown of Ago2 by shRNA caused a dramatic increase in expression of both reporter constructs, consistent with a deficit of miRNA‐mediated translational repression, and NMDAR stimulation had no effect under these conditions (Fig 5A and B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analysed two dendritically regulated UTRs; LIMK1 , which is regulated by miR‐134 (Schratt et al , 2006), and APT1 , which is regulated by miR‐138 (Siegel et al , 2009). Both of these miRNAs have been shown previously to regulate dendritic spine morphology (Schratt et al , 2006; Siegel et al , 2009), and we previously demonstrated that NMDAR activation increased translational repression of the LIMK1 reporter via miR‐134 and of the APT1 reporter via miR‐138 within 10 min after stimulation (Antoniou et al , 2014; Rajgor et al , 2017). Knockdown of Ago2 by shRNA caused a dramatic increase in expression of both reporter constructs, consistent with a deficit of miRNA‐mediated translational repression, and NMDAR stimulation had no effect under these conditions (Fig 5A and B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have suggested that microRNAs contribute to the establishment and maintenance of synaptic plasticity in developing and mature neurons (1,3,25,26). MicroRNAs regulated by neuronal activity are particularly suited for this role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…palmitoyltransferase | RISC-trap C onsiderable progress has been made in understanding the contributions of microRNAs to neuronal development, but microRNAs are also found in mature neurons, where their localization in dendrites, and possibly axons, has been proposed to contribute to synaptic plasticity (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). This is an appealing concept because local regulation of protein translation is essential for plasticity and microRNAs can regulate dendritic growth, spine formation, and growth cone guidance, properties generally believed to underlie plasticity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R. Soc. B 369: 20130515 spine growth by targeting APT1, suggesting that activitydependent miR-138 inactivation could be a mechanism of synaptic potentiation [39]. Muddashetty et al [40] investigated a possible function of FMRP in the dynamic control of miRNA function.…”
Section: Regulation Of Mirnas By Neuronal Activity (A) Activity-depenmentioning
confidence: 99%