2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of prefrontal cortex deep transcranial magnetic stimulation efficacy in adults with attention deficit/hyperactive disorder: A double blind, randomized clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study found that increased rDLPFC activation was associated with more symptom improvement in the right stimulation group. This study concluded that dTMS is an effective and feasible technique that may improve attention symptoms in adults with ADHD [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The study found that increased rDLPFC activation was associated with more symptom improvement in the right stimulation group. This study concluded that dTMS is an effective and feasible technique that may improve attention symptoms in adults with ADHD [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In ADHD, weaker function and structure in PFC circuits were previously reported 26 . MRI studies indicate that volumetric variance in prefrontal/striatal systems and caudate nucleus predicts the severity of parent-reported ADHD diagnostic behaviors 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…One study included a CT-only control condition (Charvet et al, 2018), and two studies used both control conditions (Dousset et al, 2021; Gonzalez et al, 2021). Thirteen studies (Au et al, 2016; Bleich-Cohen et al, 2021; Brambilla et al, 2021; Dousset et al, 2021; Ehrhardt et al, 2021; Filmer, Lyons, et al, 2017; Gonzalez et al, 2021; Horne et al, 2021; Jones et al, 2015; Krebs et al, 2021; Ruf et al, 2017; Sommer & Plewnia, 2021; Weller et al, 2020) included more than one control or experimental group of interest for this meta-analysis (see , for more information on the experimental and control conditions).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No outlying effect size estimates were identified. Excluding one study (Bleich-Cohen et al, 2021) decreased the total heterogeneity to 0.21 and increased the mean effect size to g = 0.23 (95% CI [0.07, 0.40], p = .006).…”
Section: Perceptual Motor Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%