A functional connectome signature of blood pressure in >30 000 participants from the UK biobank

Abstract

Aims Elevated blood pressure (BP) is a prevalent modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and contributes to cognitive decline in late life. Despite the fact that functional changes may precede irreversible structural damage and emerge in an ongoing manner, studies have been predominantly informed by brain structure and group-level inferences. Here, we aim to delineate neurobiological correlates of BP at an individual level using machine learning and functional connectivity. Methods and Results Based on whole-brain functional connectivity from the UK Biobank, we built a machine learning model to identify neural representations for individuals’ past (∼8.9 years before scanning, N = 35,882), current (N = 31,367), and future (∼2.4 years follow-up, N = 3,138) BP levels within a repeated cross-validation framework. We examined the impact of multiple potential covariates, as well as assessed these models’ generalizability across various contexts. The predictive models achieved significant correlations between predicted and actual systolic/diastolic BP and pulse pressure while controlling for multiple confounders. Predictions for participants not on antihypertensive medication were more accurate than for currently medicated patients. Moreover, the models demonstrated robust generalizability across contexts in terms of ethnicities, imaging centers, medication status, participant visits, gender, age, and BMI. The identified connectivity patterns primarily involved the cerebellum, prefrontal, anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex, supramarginal gyrus, and precuneus, which are key regions of the central autonomic network, and involved in cognition processing and susceptible to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Results also showed more involvement of default mode and frontoparietal networks in predicting future BP levels and in medicated participants. Conclusion This study, based on the largest neuroimaging sample currently available and using machine learning, identifies brain signatures underlying BP, providing evidence for meaningful BP-associated neural representations in connectivity profiles.

Blood pressure variability, central autonomic network dysfunction and cerebral small vessel disease in APOE4 carriers

“…However, causal directionality has been questioned by some (21) since BPV is partly determined by the baroreflex (22), and both neurodegeneration and white matter damage due to CSVD may be associated with autonomic dysfunction (23). Numerous functional brain MRI studies have identified a central autonomic network (CAN) involved in control of blood pressure (24), heart rate (25), heart rate variability (26) and baroreflex sensitivity (27). The CAN includes grey matter regions susceptible to vascular and neurodegenerative disease in APOE4 carriers, particularly the hippocampus (10,28), amygdala (28,29) and insular cortices (28,29).…”

Elevated C-reactive protein mediates the liver-brain axis: a preliminary study

“…Some people who were healthy at baseline may progress to have liver fibrosis, which may underestimate the liver-brain associations. However, given that it may take years for disease-related changes to be evident in brain structure, 47 this long time interval can allow us to observe the associations between liver fibrosis and lower GMVs. 5 Supporting evidence for the direct association of liver fibrosis with regional brain structure in the literature is sparse, but these results accord with emerging evidence relating chronic liver diseases to Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology and progression.…”

Cross‐cohort replicable resting‐state functional connectivity in predicting symptoms and cognition of schizophrenia

“…Subsequently, we utilized partial least squares regression (PLSR) to build the predictive model. PLSR is a widely used multivariate regression method in various fields such as bioinformatics, and neuroscience (Jiang et al, 2023; Jiang, Scheinost, et al, 2022; McIntosh et al, 1996; Meskaldji et al, 2016; Nguyen & Rocke, 2002). PLSR is particularly suitable when the number of predictors is relatively large compared to the available samples (Shen et al, 2017).…”