2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.01997
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fully non-perturbative charm-quark tuning using machine learning

R. J. Hudspith,
D. Mohler

Abstract: We present a relativistic heavy-quark action tuning for the charm sector on ensembles generated by the CLS consortium. We tune a particular 5-parameter action in an entirely non-perturbative and -up to the chosen experimental inputmodel-independent way using machine learning and the continuum experimental charmonium ground-state masses with various quantum numbers. In the end we are reasonably successful; obtaining a set of simulation parameters that we then verify produces the expected spectrum. In the future… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for using lighter-than-physical charm quark masses is that we expect discretisation effects to become more and more significant when the charm mass increases. For a rough estimate of the typical size of discretisation effects, [31] found that the effective speed of light (as defined by the dispersion relation of a meson) for physical-mass charm quarks at worst deviates from unity by 20% in our setup.…”
Section: Calibrating the Charm Mass And Currentmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason for using lighter-than-physical charm quark masses is that we expect discretisation effects to become more and more significant when the charm mass increases. For a rough estimate of the typical size of discretisation effects, [31] found that the effective speed of light (as defined by the dispersion relation of a meson) for physical-mass charm quarks at worst deviates from unity by 20% in our setup.…”
Section: Calibrating the Charm Mass And Currentmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[30] by the D s yields a heavier-than-physical η c meson at our SU(3) f -symmetric point. This comes from the quark masses at the latter point being lighter than the physical strange quark, and a D s -tuning de facto absorbs this effect into the charm-quark mass [31].…”
Section: Calibrating the Charm Mass And Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for using lighter-than-physical charm quark masses is that we expect discretisation effects to become more and more significant when the charm mass increases. For a rough estimate of the typical size of discretisation effects, [14] found that the effective speed of light (as defined by the dispersion relation of a meson) for physical-mass charm quarks at worst deviates from unity by 20% in our setup.…”
Section: A Calibrating the Charm Mass And Currentmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[13] by the D s yields a heavier-than-physical η c meson at our SU(3) f -symmetric point. This comes from the quark masses at the latter point being lighter than the physical strange quark, and a D s -tuning de facto absorbs this effect into the charm-quark mass [14].…”
Section: A Calibrating the Charm Mass And Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis -Physically interpretable results are extracted from observable measurements. ML applications thus far include cross-observable regression [82,83], action parameter regression [67,84], and new methods for ill-posed inverse problems [85][86][87][88][89][90]. As discussed further in Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%