A fully electronic intensity-modulated radiation therapy quality assurance (IMRT QA) process implemented in a network comprised of independent treatment planning, record and verify, and delivery systems

Abstract

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to implement an electronic method to perform and analyze intensity-modulated radiation therapy quality assurance (IMRT QA) using an aSi megavoltage electronic portal imaging device in a network comprised of independent treatment planning, record and verify (R&V), and delivery systems.MethodsA verification plan was generated in the treatment planning system using the actual treatment plan of a patient. After exporting the treatment fields to the R&V system, the fields were delivered in QA mode with the aSi imager deployed. The resulting dosimetric images are automatically stored in a DICOM-RT format in the delivery system treatment console computer. The relative dose density images are subsequently pushed to the R&V system. The absolute dose images are then transferred electronically from the treatment console computer to the treatment planning system and imported into the verification plan in the dosimetry work space for further analysis. Screen shots of the gamma evaluation and isodose comparison are imported into the R&V system as an electronic file (e.g. PDF) to be reviewed prior to initiation of patient treatment. A relative dose image predicted by the treatment planning system can also be sent to the R&V system to be compared with the relative dose density image measured with the aSi imager.ResultsOur department does not have integrated planning, R&V, and delivery systems. In spite of this, we are able to fully implement a paperless and filmless IMRT QA process, allowing subsequent analysis and approval to be more efficient, while the QA document is directly attached to its specific patient chart in the R&V system in electronic form. The calculated and measured relative dose images can be compared electronically within the R&V system to analyze the density differences and ensure proper dose delivery to patients.ConclusionsIn the absence of an integrated planning, verifying, and delivery system, we have shown that it is nevertheless possible to develop a completely electronic IMRT QA process.

EPID dosimetry for pretreatment quality assurance with two commercial systems

“…( 8 – 12 ) High contrast, large detector density, large detecting surfaces, linear response to radiation dose, and efficient online capabilities make EPIDs tempting candidates for IMRT QA. ( 13 – 16 ) At the same time, however, high‐Z component materials render EPIDs far from water‐equivalent. Consequently, a number of institutions and vendors have produced algorithms to either predict calibrated EPID response, or to convert calibrated EPID response into a simulated dose plane, such that EPID images can be used to verify the calculation and delivery of IMRT fields.…”

Dosimetric Evaluation of an Ipsilateral Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Beam Arrangement for Parotid Malignancies

“…Contemporarily intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the most frequently utilized radiation treatment technique for head and neck cancer and is frequently used for the postoperative treatment of parotid and other malignancies. 2 The potential benefits of IMRT include improved normal tissue sparing and target coverage through highly conformal dose distributions with steep dose gradients. Typically, IMRT is delivered with 7 to 9 axial beams equidistantly spaced along the transverse axis.…”

Doses in organs at risk during head and neck radiotherapy using IMRT and 3D-CRT

“…IMRT, in contrast, although more complex2,13,16,34, allows for more homogenous dose deposition in the target while sparing surrounding normal tissues. Moreover, IMRT allows for integration of the boost dose (SIB) in one course of the treatment, thus resulting in a higher fraction dose (hypofractionation, i.e.…”