2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fully-coupled computational framework for large-scale simulation of fluid-driven fracture propagation on parallel computers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider a class of models composed of a bulk linear-elastic material in which cohesive surfaces with non-zero opening form at a sufficient level of stress. This property of the cohesive cracks, i.e., an initially-rigid behaviour, is responsible for the singularity of the potential function and for the fact that implicit quasistatic solutions are less commonly encountered in the literature [28][29][30][31]. The system considered is a connected shape Ω in two dimensions (the logic generalizes to three dimensions) with a predefined set of interfaces Γ d , taken to be finite element boundaries (see next section), interlacing the shape.…”
Section: The Energy Approach and Its Spatial Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider a class of models composed of a bulk linear-elastic material in which cohesive surfaces with non-zero opening form at a sufficient level of stress. This property of the cohesive cracks, i.e., an initially-rigid behaviour, is responsible for the singularity of the potential function and for the fact that implicit quasistatic solutions are less commonly encountered in the literature [28][29][30][31]. The system considered is a connected shape Ω in two dimensions (the logic generalizes to three dimensions) with a predefined set of interfaces Γ d , taken to be finite element boundaries (see next section), interlacing the shape.…”
Section: The Energy Approach and Its Spatial Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gravity boldg is not being taken into account here. It should be noted that Equation 10 is a continuity equation integrated over the element aperture and that Poiseulle flow law (Equation 9) enters within as a source term 23 . We assume shale rocks as impermeable and with no fluid leak‐off into the formation.…”
Section: Numerical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extended Finite Element Method (xFEM) uses especially enriched functions allowing to incorporate the stress singularity at the fracture tip 18–20 . The Discontinuous Galerkin formulation (DG) allows to incorporate a displacement jump between nodes in the FEM meshes 21–23 . Other FEM alternatives include finite element/finite volumes, 24 continuum damage functions, 25,26 finite elements with cohesive zone models 27,28 or a combination of FEM/DEM 29 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach within this class is the discontinuous Galerkin/Cohesive Zone Model (DG/CZM) that allows the incorporation of the cohesive law. 18,19 DG/CZM avoids the need to propagate topological changes in the mesh as cracks and fragments develop. The computational and parallel scalability of these methods under fracture propagation is characterized in Giovanardi et al 18 and Smilovich and Radovitzky.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include fitted methods (e.g., zero‐thickness interface methods, 11‐13 ) and embedded methods (e.g., the generalized/extended finite element method, G/XFEM 14‐17 ). Another approach within this class is the discontinuous Galerkin/Cohesive Zone Model (DG/CZM) that allows the incorporation of the cohesive law 18,19 . DG/CZM avoids the need to propagate topological changes in the mesh as cracks and fragments develop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%