2023
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-1-w1-2023-457-2023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fully Automatic Forest Parameters Extraction at Single-Tree Level: A Comparison of MLS and TLS Applications

Abstract: Abstract. Forests are vital for ecological, economic, and social reasons, and adopting sustainable forest management practices is necessary. While traditional forest monitoring techniques provide detailed data, they are time-consuming; conversely, geomatic techniques can provide more detailed data for forest resource management. This study aims to assess the suitability of Mobile Mapping Systems (MMS) with simultaneous localisation and mapping (SLAM) technology for precision forestry purposes in challenging en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FSCT algorithm attained RMSE values consistent with the reference measurements for diameter (6 cm) and height (approximately 3 m). These values correspond to 37% of the average height and 26% of the average DBH values in described research [52].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The FSCT algorithm attained RMSE values consistent with the reference measurements for diameter (6 cm) and height (approximately 3 m). These values correspond to 37% of the average height and 26% of the average DBH values in described research [52].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…MLS, based on HHLS with an integrated simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) algorithm, offers exceptional flexibility and mobility, overcoming some problems associated with the use of multi-scan TLS methods. However, the downside of MLS compared to TLS lies in its limited accuracy and the presence of noise [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%