2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A full-scale characterization method and application for pore-throat radius distribution in tight oil reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the actual drilling differential pressure, macropores contribute the most to the permeability of the reservoir [ 26 ]. Mud filtrate primarily invades the macropores to displace the movable fluid (including movable water and oil and gas) within the detection range, while mud filtrate invades the small pores less, and the bound fluid will not change basically.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the actual drilling differential pressure, macropores contribute the most to the permeability of the reservoir [ 26 ]. Mud filtrate primarily invades the macropores to displace the movable fluid (including movable water and oil and gas) within the detection range, while mud filtrate invades the small pores less, and the bound fluid will not change basically.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, some new technologies and methods have been applied to the characterization of tight oil reservoirs, such as mercury injection (constant rate mercury injection, conventional mercury injection, etc. ), low-temperature nitrogen adsorption, low-field nuclear magnetic resonance, small-angle scattering, focused ion beam (FIB), computed tomography (CT) scanning, casting thin sections, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and other techniques. However, as far as the current research is concerned, all of the research methods and methods listed above have their limitations or disadvantages. For instance, the minimum effective pore radius detected by constant rate mercury injection technology can only reach 0.12 μm, while, as known to all, a majority of pore throat radii in tight oil reservoirs are less than 1 μm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the different effective testing range of different methods, the characterization of tight sandstone reservoirs has strong limitations, and the multifaceted comprehensive full-scale pore-throat characterization became the key content of the current study of the size distribution characteristics of a pore-throat in tight sandstone. Zhao et al generated a full-scale map of the pore-throat radius by combining low-temperature nitrogen adsorption, high-pressure mercury intrusion, and rate-controlled mercury intrusion. Xiao et al proposes a full-scale pore structure characterization method that involves interpolation of mesopore data characterized by low-temperature nitrogen adsorption into mercury-injection coordinates and combined with macropore characterized by high-pressure mercury intrusion at a pore radius of 25 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21−23 Zhao et al 24 generated a full-scale map of the pore-throat radius by combining low-temperature nitrogen adsorption, high-pressure mercury intrusion, and rate-controlled mercury intrusion. Xiao et al 25 proposes a full-scale pore structure characterization method that involves interpolation of mesopore data characterized by low-temperature nitrogen adsorption into mercury-injection coordinates and combined with macropore characterized by high-pressure mercury intrusion at a pore radius of 25 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%