2014 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ecce.2014.6953656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A full-bridge AC power flow controller with reduced capacitance operated with both FFS (Fundamental frequency switching) and PWM

Abstract: This paper proposes a single-phase full-bridge series reactive power compensator with a reduced size of the capacitor. Series compensator can be used for power flow controller and voltage stabilizer in power transmission and distribution system, and usually injects only several percent of the system voltage; therefore, FFS (Fundamental frequency switching) can be a candidate for high power applications. This paper introduces operation principles and control methods for both of the FFS and PWM operation with th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, FFS can operate under a larger-scale application especially in a transmission network, whereby PWM could only operate under the low-voltage applications. Despite its advantage, the working principle of FFS is more complex and limited as compared to PWM [154]. Therefore, in a distribution grid application, PWM would still be a better option as compared to FFS, which offers more flexibility and simplicity on various applications in PQ compensation devices, grid-feeding converters, and active filters.…”
Section: Fundamental Frequency Switching (Ffs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, FFS can operate under a larger-scale application especially in a transmission network, whereby PWM could only operate under the low-voltage applications. Despite its advantage, the working principle of FFS is more complex and limited as compared to PWM [154]. Therefore, in a distribution grid application, PWM would still be a better option as compared to FFS, which offers more flexibility and simplicity on various applications in PQ compensation devices, grid-feeding converters, and active filters.…”
Section: Fundamental Frequency Switching (Ffs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, series reactive power compensators are known as power electronics devices for power systems . These devices are connected in series to a line and inject voltage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14] These devices are connected in series to a line and inject volt-age. [9][10][11][12][13][14] These devices are connected in series to a line and inject volt-age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, series reactive power compensators are known as power electronics devices for power systems. [9][10][11][12][13][14] These devices are connected in series to a line and inject volt-age. They are characterized in that they can be realized by a device capacity corresponding to only a compensation voltage that is lower than the voltage of the power system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%