2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-009-0362-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A full Bayesian approach to generalized maximum likelihood estimation of generalized extreme value distribution

Abstract: This study develops a full Bayesian GEV distribution estimation method (BAYBETA), which contains a semi-Bayesian framework of generalized maximum likelihood estimator (GMLE), to make full use of several advantages of the Bayesian approach especially in uncertainty analysis. For the full Bayesian framework, the optimal hyperparameter of beta prior distribution on the shape parameter of the GEV distribution is found as (6.4990, 8.7927) through simulation-based analysis. In a performance comparison analysis, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, an alternative to these, employing a full Bayesian GEV estimation method which contains a semi-Bayesian framework of generalized maximum likelihood estimators and considers the shape, location and scale parameters as random variables were developed (Yoon et al 2010). However, these approaches do not consider non-stationarity.…”
Section: Generalized Extreme Value Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, an alternative to these, employing a full Bayesian GEV estimation method which contains a semi-Bayesian framework of generalized maximum likelihood estimators and considers the shape, location and scale parameters as random variables were developed (Yoon et al 2010). However, these approaches do not consider non-stationarity.…”
Section: Generalized Extreme Value Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park (2005) recommended to use α = 2.5 and β = 2.5. Yoon et al (2010) considered a full Bayesian approach for the selection of HP. We denote the MPLEs using CD, MS, and Park penalties as the MPLE-CD, MPLE-MS, and MPLE-P, respectively.…”
Section: Maximum Penalized Likelihood Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter ξ is called the shape parameter; the related location‐scale family H ξ , μ , σ ( x ) can be introduced by replacing the argument x mentioned earlier by ( x ‐ μ )/ σ and adjusting the support accordingly. Parameters are usually estimated via maximum likelihood techniques or Bayesian methods (Coles, ; Yoon et al ., ). One of the most critical issues in the block‐maxima approach is the determination of the block size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%