2017
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2017.1290834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A friendly review of absorbing boundary conditions and perfectly matched layers for classical and relativistic quantum waves equations

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to describe concisely the recent theoretical and numerical developments concerning absorbing boundary conditions and perfectly matched layers for solving classical and relativistic quantum waves problems. The equations considered in this paper are the Schrödinger, Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall computational domain is next defined by: D = D Phy ∪ D PML . We refer to [35] for the construction of PMLs for quantum wave equations and more specifically to [38] for the derivation and analysis of PMLs for the 6 Dirac equation. Here, we outline the main features of this technique which is detailed in [42].…”
Section: Absorbing Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall computational domain is next defined by: D = D Phy ∪ D PML . We refer to [35] for the construction of PMLs for quantum wave equations and more specifically to [38] for the derivation and analysis of PMLs for the 6 Dirac equation. Here, we outline the main features of this technique which is detailed in [42].…”
Section: Absorbing Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, drastic stability conditions can lead to numerical diffusion related to the finite wave propagation speed, the speed of light c.Another numerical challenge for the Dirac equation shared by any other wave equation in real space solved on a truncated domain is the need of imposing special boundary conditions in order to avoid spurious wave reflections at the computational domain boundary. Therefore, the computational methods on truncated domains require non-reflective boundary conditions [15,34,35,36,37], absorbing or perfectly matched layers (PML) [35,38,39,40,41], or the introduction of an artificial potential [38]. On the other hand, Fourier-based methods applied on bounded domains naturally induce periodic boundary conditions, which can be problematic when dealing with delocalized wave functions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is defined only in a distributional sense and using the relations above, we obtain an expression similar to (14) as follows:…”
Section: A Infinite Stripmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 and 14 for a comprehensive literature survey). For the approximate methods, we restrict ourselves to the pseudo-differential approach (in particular, the gauge transformation strategy 14 ) for constructing approximate nonreflecting boundary conditions referred to as the absorbing boundary conditions or artificial boundary conditions for various types of computational domains. Our goal is to understand operators of the form (∂ t − i Γ ) α , α = 1/2, −1/2, −1, .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that this will force us to impose absorbing conditions at the global computational domain boundary [4,11]. Then, for each subdomain Λ i,j , we will select…”
Section: Local Orbital Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%