2006
DOI: 10.21818/001c.16673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fresh Look at Followership: A Model for Matching Followership and Leadership Styles

Abstract: Followership has been an understudied topic in the academic literature and an underappreciated topic among practitioners. Although it has always been important, the study of followership has become even more crucial with the advent of the information age and dramatic changes in the workplace. This paper provides a fresh look at followership by providing a synthesis of the literature and presents a new model for matching followership styles to leadership styles. The model's practical value lies in its usefulnes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
79
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
79
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Hollander (1993) suggests that “followers can affect leaders actively in more than trivial ways” (p. 31) such that “the involvement of followers has to be recognized as a key component of effective leadership” (p. 42). Thus, a co-production orientation is associated with a view that a strong and active follower role is necessary for supporting leaders in accomplishing the organizational mission (Bjugstad et al, 2006; Crossman and Crossman, 2011; Howell and Shamir, 2005; Kellerman, 2008; Rost, 1991, 1995).…”
Section: Co-production Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hollander (1993) suggests that “followers can affect leaders actively in more than trivial ways” (p. 31) such that “the involvement of followers has to be recognized as a key component of effective leadership” (p. 42). Thus, a co-production orientation is associated with a view that a strong and active follower role is necessary for supporting leaders in accomplishing the organizational mission (Bjugstad et al, 2006; Crossman and Crossman, 2011; Howell and Shamir, 2005; Kellerman, 2008; Rost, 1991, 1995).…”
Section: Co-production Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, members must follow their leaders’ orders to generate outcomes and attain performance goals (Bjugstad, Thach, Thompson, & Morris, 2006). Mohammed and Nadkarni (2011) asserted that leaders with team temporal leadership can plan and establish effective time systems, whereas team members demonstrate followership by submitting to their leader and accepting how their leader allocates, coordinates, and manages time to achieve task performance goals on time.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social cognition theory indicates that individuals have a natural propensity to classify leaders and followers (Fiske & Taylor, 1991). However, a large body of organizational behavior research mainly adopts leader-centric perspective, while neglecting the exploration of the followership (Bjugstad, Thach, Thompson, & Morris, 2006). As a response to these research gaps, implicit followership theory (IFT) is proposed and paid more attention by scholars recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%