2012
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201200024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fresh Look at Adenosine‐Binding DNA Motifs

Abstract: One is enough: For many years an adenosine binding aptamer with two binding sites has been used in DNA devices. We now show that an aptamer with a single binding site may also be used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, a recently isolated RNA aptamer for cAMP has a 2.5‐fold higher affinity for cAMP over ATP . An ssDNA aptamer for cAMP has an approximately twofold higher affinity for cAMP over ATP …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a recently isolated RNA aptamer for cAMP has a 2.5‐fold higher affinity for cAMP over ATP . An ssDNA aptamer for cAMP has an approximately twofold higher affinity for cAMP over ATP …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA sequences identified from sequence libraries by systematic evolution by exponential enrichment (SELEX). 13 Aptamers for a number of nucleoside phosphates or cofactors, including ATP, 14,15 cAMP, 16 SAM, 17 FAD, 18,19 and GTP 20 are known, and so are ribonucleopeptides 21,22 that bind ATP or GTP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noting that the A20G mutation of the same adenosine nucleotide is both expected 6 and (here) observed to allow substantial activity, we surmise that the A20C mutation is simply not as deleterious in the 14JS101 deoxyribozyme context as in the isolated ATP aptamer. Replacing the ATP aptamer module of 14JS101 with the variant MB-1 aptamer that binds only a single molecule of ATP (versus two ATP molecules for the parent aptamer) 13 resulted in no 14JS101 activity under the same assay conditions (<0.5%; data not shown).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%