2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-017-2040-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A frequent misinterpretation in current research on liver fibrosis: the vessel in the center of CCl4-induced pseudolobules is a portal vein

Abstract: Carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury is a thoroughly studied model for regeneration and fibrosis in rodents. Nevertheless, its pattern of liver fibrosis is frequently misinterpreted as portal type. To clarify this, we show that collagen type IV "streets" and α-SMA cells accumulate pericentrally and extend to neighbouring central areas of the liver lobule, forming a 'pseudolobule'. Blood vessels in the center of such pseudolobules are portal veins as indicated by the presence of bile duct cells (CK19) and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An explanation may be that hepatocytes exhibit gene expression alterations that increase with the length of the cultivation period, leading to a decrease in the hepatocyte differentiation status (Godoy et al 2015;Zellmer et al 2010;Rowe et al 2013). Moreover, hepatotoxic effects caused by repeated doses in vivo often require the involvement of cell types other than hepatocytes, such as stellate cells (Hammad et al 2014(Hammad et al , 2017, endothelial cells (Hoehme et al 2010;Ghallab et al 2016Ghallab et al , 2018, and cholangiocytes (Jansen et al 2017;Vartak et al 2016;Ghallab et al 2018), which are not represented adequately in currently available in vitro methods. If, however, hepatocytes are the primary target of a hepatotoxic compound, it seems that this type of toxicity can be adequately identified by a single compound exposure for 48 h, at least for the compound set tested in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An explanation may be that hepatocytes exhibit gene expression alterations that increase with the length of the cultivation period, leading to a decrease in the hepatocyte differentiation status (Godoy et al 2015;Zellmer et al 2010;Rowe et al 2013). Moreover, hepatotoxic effects caused by repeated doses in vivo often require the involvement of cell types other than hepatocytes, such as stellate cells (Hammad et al 2014(Hammad et al , 2017, endothelial cells (Hoehme et al 2010;Ghallab et al 2016Ghallab et al , 2018, and cholangiocytes (Jansen et al 2017;Vartak et al 2016;Ghallab et al 2018), which are not represented adequately in currently available in vitro methods. If, however, hepatocytes are the primary target of a hepatotoxic compound, it seems that this type of toxicity can be adequately identified by a single compound exposure for 48 h, at least for the compound set tested in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be considered that an in vitro system may respond differently to repeated or chronic exposure than an organ in vivo. A suitable example of this is liver cirrhosis where repeated exposure to hepatotoxic compounds leads to hepatocyte death followed by stellate cell activation and secretion of extracellular matrix (Hammad et al 2017;Jansen et al 2017). However, since the currently available in vitro systems do not recapitulate Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This serves to detoxify xenobiotics before they are drained into the central vein [2,11]. However, for compounds metabolically activated by CYPs, such as CCl 4 or acetaminophen, the zonated expression causes a pericentral pattern of necrosis [12,13]. A zonated metabolic pattern is also known for ammonia metabolism [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%