The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1109/taslp.2016.2545920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Frequency-Domain Adaptive Line Enhancer With Step-Size Control Based on Mutual Information for Harmonic Noise Reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Common examples for harmonic noise in real‐life scenario include traffic noise, electronic noise, and so on, Harmonic noise samples are taken from the free sound effects [31] and sound ideas database [32]. The FDALE algorithm [24] with an adaptive step‐size control, proposed for harmonic noise reduction outperforms the FDALE algorithm (which uses a fixed step‐size control) [33], in terms of instrumental speech quality and intelligibility. The performance of the FDALE algorithm with adaptive step size is compared with our proposed techniques using PESQ and STOI measures and the results are given in Table 6.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Sisquimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Common examples for harmonic noise in real‐life scenario include traffic noise, electronic noise, and so on, Harmonic noise samples are taken from the free sound effects [31] and sound ideas database [32]. The FDALE algorithm [24] with an adaptive step‐size control, proposed for harmonic noise reduction outperforms the FDALE algorithm (which uses a fixed step‐size control) [33], in terms of instrumental speech quality and intelligibility. The performance of the FDALE algorithm with adaptive step size is compared with our proposed techniques using PESQ and STOI measures and the results are given in Table 6.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Sisquimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for further improvement in quality, improved noise removal in the noise dominant sub-bands than the speech dominant sub-bands is necessary that makes the noise removal to be adaptive. Adaptive noise removal techniques make use of minimum mean square error based spectral speech enhancement on the time-frequency (TF) unit and apply adaptive masking on the noise removed TF unit or exploits mutual information to derive the frequency dependent step size [23,24]. In the current work, modified spectral subtractionbased speech enhancement, proposed by the authors, is adopted on a dynamically (adaptively) varying multi-band signal for effective speech enhancement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ALEs make use of the correlation differences between the tonals and the wideband noise components [2] and are considered to be important applications of adaptive filtering techniques [13,14]. Aside from passive sonar application, ALEs have also been used in speech enhancement [15,16] and biomedical signal processing [13,17]. As pointed out in the references [18,19], ALEs require that their input signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) should be higher than certain thresholds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance the narrowband discrete components, passive sonars usually employ an adaptive line enhancer (ALE) as a pre‐processing step [9–11]. As an important application of the adaptive filter technique, ALEs have been used in many fields such as speech enhancement [12, 13] and biomedical signal processing [14]. The basic idea behind ALEs is to utilise the difference between the correlation lengths of the narrowband discrete components and wideband noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%