The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine &Amp; Biology Society (EMBC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/embc44109.2020.9176689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A freehand ultrasound framework for spine assessment in 3D: a preliminary study

Abstract: X-ray imaging is currently the gold standard for the assessment of spinal deformities. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a freehand 3D ultrasound system for volumetric reconstruction of the spine. A setup consisting of an ultrasound scanner with a linear transducer, an electromagnetic measuring system and a workstation was used. We conducted 64 acquisitions of US images of 8 adults in a natural standing position, and we tested three setups: 1) Subjects are constrained to be close to a wall, 2) Subjects … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed system automatically computes a dense scanning path and executes the scan while ensuring a safe contact force. Compared to previous free-hand scanning [25], the duration of the automatic scan over a similar area was reduced from 12 min to 5 min. The average contact force was 3.63 ± 0.30 N and 2.73 ± 0.46 N for the 3D-printed phantom and the CIRS phantom, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The proposed system automatically computes a dense scanning path and executes the scan while ensuring a safe contact force. Compared to previous free-hand scanning [25], the duration of the automatic scan over a similar area was reduced from 12 min to 5 min. The average contact force was 3.63 ± 0.30 N and 2.73 ± 0.46 N for the 3D-printed phantom and the CIRS phantom, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Then, the scanning was automatically conducted with the proposed hybrid control. Compared with previous free-hand scanning [34], the duration of automatic scanning over a similar area is shortened from 12 min to within 5 min. With hybrid control, the proposed method keeps the scanning force within a safe range to ensure good surface contact with the patient's skin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of calibration methods have been proposed in the literature [2,3,4]. The reader is referred to [5] for a comprehensive review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader is referred to [5] for a comprehensive review. Most of them operate by scanning a 3D phantom with known geometrical properties that may consist of points, wires or planes [2,3]. Among them, one popular option is to use the N-wire phantom where metal wires are designed to form "N" shapes [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%