A framework to assess evolutionary responses to anthropogenic light and sound

Abstract

28Human activities have caused a near-ubiquitous and evolutionarily-unprecedented increase in 29 environmental sound levels and artificial night lighting. These stimuli reorganize communities 30 by interfering with species-specific perception of time cues, habitat features, and auditory and 31 visual signals. Rapid evolutionary changes could occur in response to light and noise, given their 32 magnitude, geographical extent, and degree to which they represent unprecedented 33 environmental conditions. We present a framework for investigating anthropogenic light and 34 noise as agents of selection, and as drivers of other evolutionary processes, to influence a range 35 of behavioural and physiological traits, such as phenological characters and sensory and 36 signalling systems. In this context, opportunities abound for understanding contemporary and 37 rapid evolution in response to human-caused environmental change. The overcast night sky radiance in urban areas has been found to be as much as four orders of 55 magnitude larger than in natural settings (Figure 1) [5]. Similarly, increased noise levels affect a 56 sizable proportion of the human population. In Europe for instance, 65% of the population is 57 exposed to ambient sound levels exceeding 55 dB(A) [6], roughly equivalent to constant rainfall. 58Of the land in the contiguous U.S., 88% is estimated to experience elevated sound levels from 59 anthropogenic noise (Figure 1) [7]. These effects are not limited to terrestrial environments; 60 ocean noise levels are estimated to have increased by 12 decibels (an ~16-fold increase in sound 61 intensity) in the past few decades from commercial shipping alone [8], while an estimated 22% 62 of the global coastline is exposed to artificial light [3] and many offshore coral reefs are 63 chronically exposed to artificial lighting from cities, fishing boats, and hydrocarbon extraction 64 [9]. 65The changes in light at night and noise levels are occurring on a global scale similar to 66 well-recognized ecological and evolutionary forces such as land cover and climate change. In 67 4 parallel with research involving climate change [10], much of our understanding of organismal 68 response to noise and light is restricted to short-term behavioural reactions. Organismal 69 responses might be associated with tolerance to these stimuli in terms of habitat use [11,12] Status of research on anthropogenic light and sound in ecology 98Night lighting and noise are highly correlated in many landscapes (e.g., [21]). It is critical to 99 understand whether the selective pressures these stimuli exert are additive, synergistic (Figure 2), 100 or if they mitigate one another. Few studies have examined the influence of each simultaneously 101 (e.g., [21]). In one study, flashing lights combined with boat motor noise suppressed antipredator 102 behaviour in hermit crabs (Coenobita clypeatus) more so than noise alone [22]. Future research 103 should quantify both light and sound simultaneously in the same population. Existing r...

Artificial Light at Night Reduces Daily Energy Expenditure in Breeding Great Tits (Parus major)

“…Effects on circadian rhythms of behavior and physiology are particularly evident in a range of species, from insects to mammals (Swaddle et al, 2015). For instance, great tits (Parus major) provision their offspring at higher rates when exposed to experimental white ALAN directly at the nest box (Titulaer et al, 2012), and also show more activity at night in the lab (de Jong et al, 2016b), possibly incurring in energetic costs.…”

Methods in field chronobiology

“…In addition, other manipulations of the natural light/ dark cycle (e.g. use of artificial light at night in natural habitat) are possible [90] and have been shown to affect circadian as well as seasonal traits in a variety of species [91][92][93]. However, the fitness consequences of such effects are still unclear.…”

Visitor noise at a nesting colony alters the behavior of a coastal seabird

“…In 2013, visitor noise (which drove higher SPL) was adjacent to the colony, while in 2011− 2012, visitor noise was far from the colony. Previous noise levels represent the median SPL in the 20 time periods previous to the behavioral observation mals interact with their environment, resulting in masking, distraction, and/or stress (Barber et al 2010, Chan & Blumstein 2011, Swaddle et al 2015. Cormorant colonies are acoustically rich, and auditory systems mediate essential behaviors, such as predator avoidance, territory de fense, and mating decisions (Williams 1942, Wallace & Wallace 1998, N elson & Baird 2001.…”