A framework of knowledge management for successful group decision in design process

Rahmawati, Yuni; Utomo, Christiono; Anwar, Nadjadji; Negoro, Nugroho Priyo; Nurcahyo, Cahyono Bintang

doi:10.1109/icos.2014.7042410

Cited by 7 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Han et al [6] built a dynamic system to estimate the negative impact of design errors. Knowledge management and the decision support for design process [15][16][17]. Love et al [8], analyze the design errors and prevention efforts.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors of Design Errors in Construction Project (A Review)

Fuadie

Rahmawati

Utomo

2017

IJPS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Design is an important step in construction project. Errors in design cause failure in construction stage as well as the project development. Misunderstandings of design concept between parties lead to design errors that able to decrease the quality of construction works, and also cause cost overruns and project delays. Design errors also contribute to engineering failures, which can result in accidents and loss of life. Preventive actions in reducing the errors are necessary. In accordance with these issues, this research is conducted with main purpose to identify the causal factors of design error. Review to previous studies with main topic of design error was taken in order to identify the causal factors. The factors were then validated in an oil and gas industry through observation in design process and also interview to parties whom have experiences in design process. Based from research, it is found that there are 5 main causal factors. The factors are man, method, material, machine, and environment. There are also several factors that are less in accordance with the conditions in the field such as cognitive dissonance, competitive tendering, and adversarial attitudes. By knowing the cause of the design error, can be done to prevent the effort of guarantee project sustainability.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors of Design Errors in Construction Project (A Review)

Fuadie

Rahmawati

Utomo

2017

IJPS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…DM 1 There exists a protocol to solve problems collaboratively. [14,16,23,35,40,41,43,57,62] DM 2 The Last Planner identifies the problem and performs a causal analysis (e.g., the 5 why's method). [16,23,35,40,43] DM 3 The solution to the problem is implemented, monitored, and documented to verify that the problem was solved.…”

Section: Id Definition Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The decision-making mechanism is a meeting with all stakeholders involved, where a specific technique is used, for example, choosing by advantage (CBA) or others. [14,22,23,35,40,42,43,58,[62][63][64] DM 8…”

Section: Id Definition Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Assessment of Lean Design Management Practices in Construction Projects

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evidence exists for the application of lean management practices in the design process. However, there is no systematic review of this type of practice that links the design management practices to the lean construction principles. There is no tool to assess the level of use of lean design management practices in construction projects either. Therefore, this paper aims to assess the lean management practices that are performed at the design phase of construction projects. The research was divided into a literature review of design management practices; a validation of lean design management practices with a practice-principle relationship, based on an expert survey; the devolvement of a tool (questionnaire) to evaluate the lean design management practices; and an assessment in 64 construction projects (coherence, reliability, correlation, and descriptive analysis). It is concluded that evidence exists for the implementation of 19 lean design management practices. These practices are grouped into three categories: stakeholder management, planning and control, and problem solving and decision making. Additionally, in the assessment of the 64 projects, it can be observed that the lean design management practices are at initial levels of implementations, so there is a significant development gap. This research proposes a tool to assess management practices in the design phase of construction projects; then, the study identifies implementations gaps, it provides benchmarks with other projects, and it improves the design process through a taxonomy of lean design management practices. been studied to evaluate its performance [7], to implement integrated management systems and visual management tools [8], as well as to optimize this process [6].Technological tools have great potential to improve the performance of projects, particularly in the design phase. However, the problems generated in the design of construction projects cannot be solved with technology alone but require an understanding of the social phenomena related to the processing of individual and collective information [9]. For this reason, certain lean tools can allow higher interactions because they encourage the management of commitment and trust among team members [10][11][12][13].Evidence exists for the application of lean management principles and some of its tools in the design management process [14,15]. For example, Fosse & Ballard [16] presented a case study that demonstrated the change between traditional planning and planning using the last planner ® system (LPS ® ) at the design phase. Although they did not present evidence of the changes in the project s performance, they concluded that the degree of satisfaction of the project s stakeholders increased when the LPS ® was applied during the planning phase of the project. For their part, Knotten et al. [17] emphasized that the use of LPS ® and collaborative planning in the design phase reinforced the trust and commitment among the members of the team, which are both considered fundamental elemen...

show abstract

“…Integration is vital for the performance of collaborative design. There are two main aspects that are needed to be integrated, which are tangible and intangible aspects [7]. During design process, each expertise is encouraged to share their knowledge.…”

Section: Conceptual Framework Of Collaborative Decisionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative Decision for Building Energy System on Traditional Markets in Urban Areas

Utomo

Rahmawati

Negoro

2017

IJPS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It becomes more important to design energy-efficient for buildings. This is true in relationship to a public building design especially retail property such as traditional market. It calculates the use of energy during construction and operation. There are three alternatives for a building energy system which are passive energy, electrical equipment, and user processes. The alternatives are developed for a public commercial retail. They were selected by four stakeholders named government, tenant, designer, and property manager. It is not easy to make a decision where there are many stakeholders' interests. A decision support system is necessary. The system should support a collaborative process among decision makers. This paper presents a multi criteria and multi person decision process to develop agreement options and coalition formation to find the best fit option of the energy system for traditional markets building in urban areas. There are three stages involved in the process which are first is determining and scoring of every alternative for every stakeholder, second is determining the optimal solution (payoff optimum) for each stakeholder in a coalition, and third is analyzing the best fit options for every coalition and grand coalition. An analytical hierarchy process (AHP) based on satisfying option is applied for the first stage. A liner programming is used to determine payoff optimum in the stage two and an agent system based on game theory built the coalition algorithm on the stage three. The result shows a model of collaborative decision to select a building system at design process.

show abstract

A framework of knowledge management for successful group decision in design process

Cited by 7 publications

References 25 publications

Factors of Design Errors in Construction Project (A Review)

Factors of Design Errors in Construction Project (A Review)

An Assessment of Lean Design Management Practices in Construction Projects

Collaborative Decision for Building Energy System on Traditional Markets in Urban Areas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About