2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework of boundary collision data aggregation into neighbourhoods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the efficiency of macro-level traffic safety analysis may be subject to the well-known modifiable areal unit problem Lee et al, 2014b;Xu et al, 2014) and boundary issue Cui et al, 2015). From another perspective, the safety problem is anyhow a microscopic problem and the direct contributing factors could be related to micro-level factors for a specific road segment or intersection, or the driver-vehicle units involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the efficiency of macro-level traffic safety analysis may be subject to the well-known modifiable areal unit problem Lee et al, 2014b;Xu et al, 2014) and boundary issue Cui et al, 2015). From another perspective, the safety problem is anyhow a microscopic problem and the direct contributing factors could be related to micro-level factors for a specific road segment or intersection, or the driver-vehicle units involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Research [35] found that children in Canada are at a much higher risk of major injuries when involved in a back-over collision. The physical aspect of a collision is studied in a few cities in Canada, such as Edmonton [36] and Ottawa [37]. These studies analyse the proximity of two vehicles and its effect on the collisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cui et al proposed a collision density ratio (CDR) method to aggregate boundary crashes (9). They conducted a case study of two areas in the city of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, and compared the CDR method with two other methods (the half-to-half and oneto-one ratio methods) by developing nonspatial negative binomial (NB) crash prediction models and a chi-square test.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%