A framework for visual notation exchange

Stoeckle, Hermann; Grundy, John; Hosking, John

doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2004.08.002

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, a form-based mapper was introduced to help business analyst users perform data mapping using a concrete form-based metaphor [5]; Transformations to support data integration within multiple views of source and target models [10], [11]; Mapping agents to generate automated mappings between multiple source and targets [7]; And support for mapping and transformation generation using concrete visualizations [12], [13]. Each of these frameworks was targeted to address a specific domain, audience or data mapping problem.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

V for variety: Lessons learned from complex smart cities data harmonization and integration

Avazpour

Grundy

Zhu

2016

2016 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-With emerging trends for Internet of Things (IoT) and Smart Cities, complex data transformation, aggregation and visualization problems are becoming increasingly common. These tasks support improved business intelligence, analytics and enduser access to data. However, in most cases developers of these tasks are presented with challenging problems including noisy data, diverse data formats, data modeling and increasing demand for sophisticated visualization support. This paper describes our experiences with just such problems in the context of Household Travel Surveys data integration and harmonization. We describe a common approach for addressing these harmonizations. We then discuss a set of lessons that we have learned from our experience that we hope will be useful for others embarking on similar problems. We also identify several key directions and needs for future research and practical support in this area.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

V for variety: Lessons learned from complex smart cities data harmonization and integration

Avazpour

Grundy

Zhu

2016

2016 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, they are usually hard coded for specific problem domains or use fixed visualizations [17]. In addition, they mostly require users to specify correspondences on meta-models rather than concrete visualizations [10,28,29,16,4]. This is also true for graph based transformations, where source and target models are represented using abstract graphs [8][9][10][11].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Specifying model transformations by direct manipulation using concrete visual notations and interactive recommendations

Avazpour

Grundy

Grunske

2015

Journal of Visual Languages & Computing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The goal of presentation integration would then be to facilitate the correct matching of user interfaces to the dierent users. The idea that presentation integration is by necessity a separate concern is even challenged by Stoeckle et al (2005), since visualization notations may, through control or data integration, achieve the same result as a common look and feel.…”

Section: Presentation Integrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The discourse on tool integration beyond technology, a literature survey

Asplund

Törngren

2015

Journal of Systems and Software

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The tool integration research area emerged in the 1980s. This survey focuses on those strands of tool integration research that discuss issues beyond technology.We reveal a discourse centered around six frequently mentioned non-functional properties. These properties have been discussed in relation to technology and high level issues. However, while technical details have been covered, high level issues and, by extension, the contexts in which tool integration can be found, are treated indierently. We conclude that this indierence needs to be challenged, and research on a larger set of stakeholders and contexts initiated.An inventory of the use of classication schemes underlines the diculty of evolving the classical classication scheme published by Wasserman. Two frequently mentioned redenitions are highlighted to facilitate their wider use.A closer look at the limited number of research methods and the poor attention to research design indicates a need for a changed set of research methods.We propose more critical case studies and method diversication through theory triangulation.Additionally, among disparate discourses we highlight several focusing on standardization which are likely to contain relevant ndings. This suggests that open communities employed in the context of (pre-)standardization could be especially important in furthering the targeted discourse.

show abstract

A framework for visual notation exchange

Abstract: Abstract

Cited by 8 publications

References 27 publications

V for variety: Lessons learned from complex smart cities data harmonization and integration

V for variety: Lessons learned from complex smart cities data harmonization and integration

Specifying model transformations by direct manipulation using concrete visual notations and interactive recommendations

The discourse on tool integration beyond technology, a literature survey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About