2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for understanding the relationship between externally and internally directed cognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
185
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
13
185
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This question has been previously explored mainly through the use of fMRI, and the prominent loci of activations have been found in the frontal lobes (reviewed in refs. 18,19). However, fMRI studies are necessarily correlational and cannot establish a causal link between behavior and the neural substrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This question has been previously explored mainly through the use of fMRI, and the prominent loci of activations have been found in the frontal lobes (reviewed in refs. 18,19). However, fMRI studies are necessarily correlational and cannot establish a causal link between behavior and the neural substrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, fMRI studies found that the executive control network (16) and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in particular have also been activated during mind-wandering tasking (10,12,17). These latter results have been taken as evidence to support the role of the executive control network in mind wandering (18,19). The extent to which executive function is involved in mind wandering has been debated over recent years (5,20), because executive function is associated with an external task focus (antithetical to mind wandering).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The neuroimaging and neurological literatures were then synthesized with the literatures on dream content and on the gradual development of frequent and complex dreaming in children to create a neurocognitive theory of dreaming (Domhoff, 2001. Around the same time, a serendipitous discovery showed that a ''default'' network of brain regions is spontaneously active during restful states, and supports mind-wandering and daydreaming during waking (e.g., Addis, Wong, & Schacter, 2007;Andrews-Hanna, Reidler, Huang, & Buckner, 2010;Christoff, Gordon, Smallwood, Smith, & Schooler, 2009;Dixon, Fox, & Christoff, 2014;Kucyi & Davis, 2014;Mason et al, 2007). Not only is the default network activated during waking daydreaming; recent findings show that many hubs of the default network are even more active during REM sleep than at rest, augmented by secondary visual and sensorimotor cortices that support sensorimotor imagery (Chow et al, 2013;Fox, Nijeboer, Solomonova, Domhoff, & Christoff, 2013).…”
Section: Introduction and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, these results suggest that directed and spontaneous self-referential thoughts share many commonalities, but may differ in the extent to which they rely on effortful cognitive processes (see also Dixon, Fox, & Christoff, 2014). …”
mentioning
confidence: 71%