A framework for understanding artificial intelligence research: insights from practice

Abstract

PurposeThe current evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) practices and applications is creating a disconnection between modern-day information system (IS) research and practices. The purpose of this study is to propose a classification framework that connects the IS discipline to contemporary AI practices.Design/methodology/approachWe conducted a review of practitioner literature to derive our framework's key dimensions. We reviewed 103 documents on AI published by 25 leading technology companies ranked in the 2019 list of Fortune 500 companies. After that, we reviewed and classified 110 information system (IS) publications on AI using our proposed framework to demonstrate its ability to classify IS research on AI and reveal relevant research gaps.FindingsPractitioners have adopted different definitional perspectives of AI (field of study, concept, ability, system), explaining the differences in the development, implementation and expectations from AI experienced today. All these perspectives suggest that perception, comprehension, action and learning are the four capabilities AI artifacts must possess. However, leading IS journals have mostly published research adopting the “AI as an ability” perspective of AI with limited theoretical and empirical studies on AI adoption, use and impact.Research limitations/implicationsFirst, the framework is based on the perceptions of AI by a limited number of companies, although it includes all the companies leading current AI practices. Secondly, the IS literature reviewed is limited to a handful of journals. Thus, the conclusions may not be generalizable. However, they remain true for the articles reviewed, and they all come from well-respected IS journals.Originality/valueThis is the first study to consider the practitioner's AI perspective in designing a conceptual framework for AI research classification. The proposed framework and research agenda are used to show how IS could become a reference discipline in contemporary AI research.

Can we trust AI? An empirical investigation of trust requirements and guide to successful AI adoption

“…The need to develop suitable ethical positions toward AI is also widely accepted, while sustainability currently seems to play only a subordinate role in relation to very specific ecological issues. Although, we found first references by research and practice on this topic (European Commission, 2020; Goralski and Tan, 2020), indeed, the fundamental questions raised in the current discourse on AI (Bawack et al, 2021) mainly point in a completely different direction than those commonly associated with sustainability. This is likely to cause confusion and limit the impact of both discourses.…”

“…Artificial intelligence AI is an overarching term for a variety of different design approaches that enable technical devices to perform operations similar to human cognition (Bawack et al, 2021). The added value that deductive reasoning, knowledge-based systems, pattern recognition and other AI technologies can provide has lately been documented in numerous different contexts (cf.…”

Structuring the Quest for Strategic Alignment of Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Taxonomy of the Organizational Business Value of AI Use Cases

“…The identification of the operator behind the AI use case allows for further assessment of the corresponding implications, such as the degree of influence on the business value contribution the company has itself (i.e., the more tasks of the AI use case are assigned to the AI, the lower is the human influence), or how much increase in workload will come along with it (the more tasks of the AI use case are assigned to human workers, the higher will be the workload). As scholars state, AI is used to augment human capabilities [5], while "humans can still offer a more holistic, intuitive approach" [23, p.577], focusing on more creative assignments [21]. We refer to Davenport and Ronanki [11], Ransbotham et al [40], as well as Dellermann et al [13] for the different forms of AI collaboration with human intelligence.…”

Consumer Adoption of Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Theories and Antecedents

“…Thus, using traditional technology acceptance theories and models would not sufficiently explain consumer adoption of AI [11]. This challenge has led to several calls for research on new theoretical developments and perspectives that focus on the specificities of AI technologies to understand their adoption by consumers [10], [12], [13].…”