A framework for the joint institutionalization of climate change mitigation and adaptation in city administrations

Abstract

Cities are key actors in reducing both the causes of climate change (mitigation) and its impact (adaptation), and many have developed separate mitigation and adaptation strategies and measures. However, in order to maximize outcomes, both scholars and practitioners are increasingly calling for more integrated and synergetic approaches. Unfortunately, related research remains scarce and fragmented, and there is a lack of systematic investigation into the necessary institutional conditions and processes. Against this background, this paper develops a framework to assess and support the joint institutionalization of climate adaptation and mitigation-here called adaptigation-in city administrations. This pioneering framework draws upon four key features of bureaucracies: organizational structure, visions and goals, actors, and technology and tools. Illustrated by pilot applications to the cities of Würzburg (Germany) and Mwanza (Tanzania), the framework provides a robust basis for future research, policy recommendations, and the development of context-specific guidelines for national and local decision-makers and officials. It highlights the importance of (i) clearly defined procedures for the implementation of adaptigation into urban planning processes (e.g., with the active involvement of stakeholders in the form of working groups or roundtable discussions), (ii) locally relevant goals and visions, established in collaboration with stakeholders, and (iii) the creation of mitigation and adaptation structures that are supported by the appropriate level of human resources, both within and outside city administrations. In this context, global, Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change (2019) 24:1-21 https://doi

Do corporate governance structure and capital structure matter for the performance of the firms? An empirical testing with the contemplation of outliers

“…A study on governance and sustainable performance of firms have established that different component of governance in an organization cause sustainable performance [21]. Likewise, a study about corporations' governance and climate change management found that different governance mechanisms help effectively mitigate and implement climate change management strategies [52].…”

“…The rationale behind choosing this period is that no company has been closed, merged or acquired during this period. Another reason is that a 5-year timeframe is sufficient for consistent and robust results of this type of research [52]. The annual reports are utilized, which are downloaded from official websites of the companies and the official website of the state bank of Pakistan for the selected period.…”

An institutional analysis to address climate change adaptation in Tenerife (Canary Islands)

“…Meanwhile, according to ENGO, it might be possible that “ these plans [see Table 2] are insufficient [to deal with CC] since, in most cases, they do not deal with the causes of the problems [i.e. greenhouse gases emissions]”, referring to the need to integrate adaptation and mitigation to CC as indicated elsewhere (Göpfert et al, 2018; Ürge-Vorsatz et al, 2018).…”

Multilevel Climate Governance, Anticipatory Adaptation, and the Vulnerability‐Readiness Nexus

“…Recent research focuses on the role of climate governance in the adaptation process (c.f., Ampaire et al, 2017; Amundsen, Berglund, & Westskog, 2010; Bulkeley, 2013; Bulkeley & Betsill, 2005; Cuevas, Peterson, Robinson, & Morrison, 2016; Dovers & Hezri, 2010; Engle & Lemos, 2010; Göpfert, Wamsler, & Lang, 2019; Hlahla, Nel, & Hill, 2019; Juhola & Westerhoff, 2011; Lund, 2018; Naess, Bang, Eriksen, & Vevatne, 2005; Oulahen et al, 2018; Phuong et al, 2018; Rashidi & Patt, 2018; Russel et al, 2018). Key elements of interest in these studies involve varying forms of policy process.…”