A Framework for the Evaluation of Internet-based Diabetes Management

Abstract

BackgroundWhile still in its infancy, Internet-based diabetes management shows great promise for growth. However, the following aspects must be considered: what are the key metrics for the evaluation of a diabetes management site? how should these sites grow in the future and what services should they offer?ObjectivesTo examine the needs of the patient and the health care professional in an Internet-based diabetes management solution and how these needs are translated into services offered.MethodsAn evaluation framework was constructed based on a literature review that identified the requirements for an Internet-based diabetes management solution. The requirements were grouped into 5 categories: Monitoring, Information, Personalization, Communication, and Technology. Two of the market leaders (myDiabetes and LifeMasters) were selected and were evaluated with the framework. The Web sites were evaluated independently by 5 raters using the evaluation framework. All evaluations were performed from November 1, 2001 through December 15, 2001.ResultsThe agreement level between raters ranged from 60% to 100%. The multi-rater reliability (kappa) was 0.75 for myDiabetes and 0.65 for LifeMasters, indicating substantial agreement. The results of the evaluations indicate that LifeMasters is a more-complete solution than myDiabetes in all dimensions except Information, where both sites were equivalent. LifeMasters satisfied 32 evaluation criteria while myDiabetes satisfied 24 evaluation criteria, out of a possible 40 in the framework.ConclusionsThe framework is based on the recognition that the management of diabetes via the Internet is based on several integrated dimensions: Monitoring, Information, Personalization, Communication, and Technology. A successful diabetes management system should efficiently integrate all dimensions. The evaluation found that LifeMasters is successful in integrating the health care professional in the management of diabetes and that MyDiabetes is quite effective in providing a communication channel for community creation (however, communication with the health care professional is lacking).

Clinical Inertia and Outpatient Medical Errors

“…There is substantial evidence to support this third point as well. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] While the clinical points made by Phillips disease care. In chronic disease management, the task faced by health care providers (and the patient) is one in which decisions are made to control a process that is manifest in varying states of patient health.…”

Assessing interest in an osteoporosis website: a survey among women eligible for osteoporosis screening

“…Beyond the passive, one-directional provision of health information, healthcare providers are increasingly extending Internet services to patients by developing clinic-based, interactive websites that facilitate healthcare transactions (e.g., prescription refill requests, receipt of laboratory results) and provide endorsed educational materials and self-management tools [1]. Such "e-disease management" programs have been described for several chronic conditions, including diabetes [2] and depression [3], and it has been demonstrated that patients who are Internet naïve can successfully maneuver e-disease management sites if barriers to computer literacy are addressed [4].…”

Health Education in Diabetic Population: Current Practice and Future Challenges

“…Internet-based diabetes management systems have the potential of reducing the burden of disease management cost, both to the patient and to the health care system. 31 In short, the primary challenge is to mainstream the health education role in diabetic care to provide cost effective services.…”