2006
DOI: 10.1177/0278364906068374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for the Control of Nonholonomic Mobile Manipulators

Abstract: A general framework for the feedback control of mobile manipulators is proposed. Its main originality lies in its capacity to address in a unified manner both cases of omnidirectional and nonholonomic mobile platforms. It also allows for the execution of the desired manipulation task without the manipulator colliding into its joint limits, whenever these two objectives are compatible. This is obtained without having to rely upon trajectory planning. In the nonholonomic case this feature, which is not demonstra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second approach, considered in the works [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] is based on the application of the (generalized) pseudoinverse of the mobile manipulator Jacobian matrix in the control formulation. Control algorithms developed from the pseudo-inverse of the Jacobian matrix are attractive and further examined by many researchers, they also have some disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach, considered in the works [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] is based on the application of the (generalized) pseudoinverse of the mobile manipulator Jacobian matrix in the control formulation. Control algorithms developed from the pseudo-inverse of the Jacobian matrix are attractive and further examined by many researchers, they also have some disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A solution at the kinematic level to the inverse kinematic problem to solve the point-to-point problem in a workspace with obstacles has been formulated by Galicki in [9]. Fruchard et al in the work [10] have presented a kinematic control method based on the transverse function approach. The realisation of the manipulation task has been set as the prime objective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, output tracking laws are easier to design and implement, and can be embedded in a sensorbased control architecture when the task is not fully known in advance. For this reason, with the exception of [3] that takes a somehow intermediate approach, most works on NMMs focus on kinematic control, e.g., [4]- [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ultimately leads to the impossibility of performing the assigned tasks, due to the loss of controllability of the NMM in its configuration space. While this control problem has been pointed out in the recent past [3], [10], no solution based on output tracking has been proposed so far to the best of out knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%