2014 International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccoins.2014.6868360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for the automatic identification of algae (Neomeris vanbosseae M.A. Howe):U<sup>3</sup>S

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of color-based segmentation, species specific features and an underwater camera in study [12] implies that the algae monitoring system cannot be applied on a different hardware platform such as an UAV, USV, or smartphone and is susceptible to occlusion and variations in illumination, which are regular occurrences in an outdoor environment. Similarly, the novel approach of combining the use of a smartphone camera and the inertial sensors present on a robotic fish to detect the shoreline and hence perform image segmentation to detect algal blooms as presented in the paper [11] is optimized for their specific hardware platform (i.e., robotic fish) and is susceptible to variable illumination, occlusion and shadows cast by surrounding vegetation.…”
Section: B Computer Vision Based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of color-based segmentation, species specific features and an underwater camera in study [12] implies that the algae monitoring system cannot be applied on a different hardware platform such as an UAV, USV, or smartphone and is susceptible to occlusion and variations in illumination, which are regular occurrences in an outdoor environment. Similarly, the novel approach of combining the use of a smartphone camera and the inertial sensors present on a robotic fish to detect the shoreline and hence perform image segmentation to detect algal blooms as presented in the paper [11] is optimized for their specific hardware platform (i.e., robotic fish) and is susceptible to variable illumination, occlusion and shadows cast by surrounding vegetation.…”
Section: B Computer Vision Based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, current methodologies for algae monitoring require significant manpower, making them economically unfeasible (e.g., it was projected that a budget of $3.5 million was required to monitor the 100 largest lakes in Oklahoma once a month [9]). Alternatively, methods may depend upon the hardware available, which can be in the form of drones [10], robotic fish [11], underwater cameras [12] or satellites [13], which limits their applicability in varying environmental, topological and socio-economic conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%