A framework for technology assessment: Case of a Thai building material manufacturer

Selection of Waste Lubricant Oil Regenerative Technology Using Entropy-Weighted Risk-Based Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Approach

“…Many MCDM methods have been used for technology selection, such as Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE), method for regeneration technologies assessment and selection (Pohekar and Ramachandran, 2004;Khelifi et al, 2006;Behzadian et al, 2010), Best Available Technology (BAT) framework in multiple industries (Georgopoulou et al, 2007;Liu and Wen, 2012;Chung et al, 2013;Ibáñez-Forés et al, 2013, the Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTRE-II) method in environmental issues (Pohekar and Ramachandran, 2004;Hatami-Marbini et al, 2013;Wen et al, 2015), reference point technique and subjective weight factors methods in technology assessment (Duijm, 2002), expert judgment based models (Shehabuddeen et al, 2006;Daim and Intarode, 2009), TOPSIS in analysis of alternatives for selection of enabling technology (Georgiadis et al, 2013), Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding Hybrid Algorithm (THOR) in waste recycling technology selections (Gomes et al, 2008), VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija IKompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) in platform selection (Lin et al, 2016), Analytical Network Process (ANP) (Molinos-Senante et al, 2015), fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) and fuzzy TOPSIS (Taylan et al, 2016), fuzzy Delphi integrated with fuzzy AHP as well as crisp AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection (Hsu et al, 2010;Hsu and Liu, 2011), and graphical and traditional methods in waste lubricant regenerative technology selection (Chari et al, 2012).…”

Technology Assessment in Software Development Projects Using a System Dynamics Approach: A Case of Application Frameworks

“…The objective of this assessment is to evaluate the consequences of introducing a technology. If the assessment is done before the technology adoption and investment, it reduces the risk of ineffective investment decisions [3]. When an organization integrates new technologies without being aware and prepared for its impact, it can lead to serious problems.…”

Evaluating technologies for education: case of ePortfolio

“…It is a robust method and used in areas including energy Daim and Intarode 2009;van Blommestein and Daim 2013;Daim et al 2013;Wang et al 2010), design (Hallum and Daim 2009), and human resource management (Harrel and Daim 2010). Studies exploring the interface between education and computers have also used HDM (Tseng 2010;Huang et al 2011;Lin 2010;Wu and Lin 2012;Shee and Wang 2008;Bhuasiri et al 2012).…”