2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2965327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Taxonomy and Evaluation of Self-Reconfigurable Robotic Systems

Abstract: Self-reconfigurable robots have been proposed for a quite long period and in large numbers. However, there are very few systematic methodologies proposed to categorize and evaluate such kinds of robots. In this paper, we put forward a framework for taxonomy and evaluation (TAEV) of self-reconfigurable robots, based on the mechanism reconfigurability and the level of autonomy for reconfiguration. The mechanism reconfigurability of the robots is divided into two types: inter-reconfigurability and intra-reconfigu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The environmental conditions in the real drain environment pose a challenge while adapting on wet surface and with obstacles along the path. The future research work aims at increasing the autonomy level index [28] which has to be achieved by focusing on the weight optimization, locomotion ability of platform on various rough terrain, stability analysis, wall collision avoidance, controller design for the leg joints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The environmental conditions in the real drain environment pose a challenge while adapting on wet surface and with obstacles along the path. The future research work aims at increasing the autonomy level index [28] which has to be achieved by focusing on the weight optimization, locomotion ability of platform on various rough terrain, stability analysis, wall collision avoidance, controller design for the leg joints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precedence of the Tarantula-II is based on the first version of the robot here referred as Tarantula-I reported in [27]. The two versions can be compared using the framework for evaluating the autonomy of the self-reconfigurable robot as reported in [28]. The autonomy index (AI) calculated based on the six factors, namely, perception, workspace, interface autonomy, reconfiguration planning, decision making and execution levels as [1,2,0,1,0,1] resulting in AI as 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of reconfigurability for floor cleaning robot would be useful in improving the area coverage. Thereby, many reconfigurable floor cleaning robots inspired by tiling theory have been introduced [30]. hTetro [33], hTromo [34], hHoneycomb [25] and hTetrakis [19] can be considered as examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is a robot that comprises a group of intelligent modules, and the second is a robot that comprises of a group of modules where the intelligence comes from an external agent. In our previous work, we have classified self-reconfigurable robots into three categories which are nested reconfigurability [ 16 , 17 , 18 ], intra reconfigurability [ 19 , 20 ], and inter reconfigurability [ 21 , 22 ]. The hTetro described earlier has nested reconfigurability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%