2020
DOI: 10.3390/w12123466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Sustainable Planning and Decision-Making on Resource Recovery from Wastewater: Showcase for São Paulo Megacity

Abstract: Currently, it is important to develop strategic frameworks to support the selection of sustainable resource recovery solutions. This study applies a new framework for planning, implementation, and assessment of resource recovery strategies for a full-scale wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in São Paulo megacity. The framework comprises several steps based on case study-specific data and information from current literature. Data were collected from various sources: a survey with a wastewater treatment utility, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(178 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The removal of suspended solids occurs predominantly in the filtration process. The similar kind of results were reported by Chrispim and Nolasco, 2017, they found about 80-90% removal of SS concentration. They also conclude that removal highly depends on the working of aeration system.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Urban Dwwtsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The removal of suspended solids occurs predominantly in the filtration process. The similar kind of results were reported by Chrispim and Nolasco, 2017, they found about 80-90% removal of SS concentration. They also conclude that removal highly depends on the working of aeration system.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Urban Dwwtsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…While a diverse range of decision-makers, stakeholders, and experts often participate in the decisionmaking process, the methods described in the literature often rely on assessments by experts, with the decisionmakers and stakeholders not clearly identified (Table S1 in Supporting Information). Consequently, these roles are often conflated in the literature, and most studies present rankings of alternatives that reflect the opinions of stakeholders or experts rather than decision-makers (Arroyo & Molinos-Senante, 2018;Chrispim et al, 2020;De Gisi et al, 2014;Gherghel et al, 2020;Lienert et al, 2011;Lizot et al, 2020;Strapasson & dos Santos, 2020). Kalbar et al (2012Kalbar et al ( , 2015Kalbar et al ( , 2016 ranked alternatives using weights established by the researcher without the participation of decision-makers and stakeholders.…”
Section: General Mcdamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application requirements of this system mainly include the following four aspects: realizing the information sharing and sharing mechanism between various economic management departments and providing real-time and accurate economic data for the healthy development of the whole province's macroeconomy; improving the informatization level of economic management and improving the efficiency of economic management of the whole society; building a decision-making support system for macroeconomic and social management and regulation and enhancing the accuracy and effectiveness of economic decision-making; and, at the same time, enhancing the service and information release for the whole society [ 14 ].…”
Section: Economic Management Information System and Data Resource All...mentioning
confidence: 99%