2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for rule-base evidential reasoning in the interval setting applied to diagnosing type 2 diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 3 presents a new approach to the rule-base evidential reasoning which makes it possible to use an information of values of all membership functions representing the intersecting (competing) fuzzy classes in the fuzzy logic rules. Based on real-world examples of type 2 diabetes diagnostics, we have shown that the new approach provides reasonable and intuitively obvious results in the cases when the known approaches (see [6,7,18,19]) lead to the controversial or wrong results. Finally the concluding section summarises the paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Section 3 presents a new approach to the rule-base evidential reasoning which makes it possible to use an information of values of all membership functions representing the intersecting (competing) fuzzy classes in the fuzzy logic rules. Based on real-world examples of type 2 diabetes diagnostics, we have shown that the new approach provides reasonable and intuitively obvious results in the cases when the known approaches (see [6,7,18,19]) lead to the controversial or wrong results. Finally the concluding section summarises the paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, the diagnosis Pre-diabetes in the spirit of DST can be treated as the compound hypothesis (H,D). Based on the known approaches to the rule-base evidential reasoning ( [6,19]) we get the following rules: Fig.1) using the above rules (3) and the conventional fuzzy logic, from the first test we get the diagnosis H (with m * Since these two tests are different sources of evidence, to obtain the final diagnosis they should be combined using an appropriate combination rule. Nevertheless, the use of classical fuzzy logic may lead to the counterintuitive results.…”
Section: Fig 1 Test 1 (Blood Glucose X1) and Test 2 (Blood Glucose X2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [11,13,17], a new approach free of both above mentioned restrictions was developed and used for the solution of real-world problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Ref. 12) discussed that there are two restrictions in the RIMER approach. One of them is that the RIMER approach did not provide the combination method of different evidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%