2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for remote in-service metrological surveillance of energy meters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the uncertainty of remote monitoring is way larger than achievable in certified laboratories. For example, in the use case presented in [8] the uncertainty of remotely assessed meter multiplicative correction factor (adjustment gain) was found 9.4% assuming the nominal value of correction factor is equal to 1. A 0.63% power measurement error uncertainty of a Class 1 meter is reported for the noninvasive error monitoring technique described in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, the uncertainty of remote monitoring is way larger than achievable in certified laboratories. For example, in the use case presented in [8] the uncertainty of remotely assessed meter multiplicative correction factor (adjustment gain) was found 9.4% assuming the nominal value of correction factor is equal to 1. A 0.63% power measurement error uncertainty of a Class 1 meter is reported for the noninvasive error monitoring technique described in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In both cases, meters' conformance is not monitored until the expiration of the verification period. Therefore, techniques enabling to monitor the energy meter's accuracy between verifications are in demand [3], [4]. Equipment for in-field verification of energy meters like portable meter testers, portable standards, on-site calibrators, energy meter test sets, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%